Monday, 28 September 2015

(59) The Killer Hominid

Basic Dimension 

The killer Hominid

With killer Hominids especially we focus on Homininae (7 million years ago (mya); 400 cc).

Killer Hominids are made by evolution in harsh environments. And since we all are partly killer Hominids this discussion is about gradation. The first pathological killer is the chimpanzee (Pan paniscus), which evolved in an environment with insufficient food supply. He must be compared with the friendly and socialized bonobo (Pan troglodytes):

Second psychopathic killers were inhabitants of Paradise culture, humanlike creatures which evolved under harsh conditions of the steppes and deserts of Africa and whose descendants are now living in the arid regions of the Arabian Peninsula. From them comes the acclaimed paradise story.

Both, chimpanzees and Paradise culture underwent severe genetic selections. In the evolution chimp males have been killed systematically if they did not fit into the hierarchy. Consequently, certain traits have been culled in the course of million years of evolution.

The same occurred with Paradise culture where members not fitting in the inbreeding and incest culture have been murdered systematically for about 7 million years. 
Muslims are the lineal descendants of Paradise culture:

This blog is dedicated to three brave young women who paid with their lives for genetic freedom:

Islamic culture is the prototype of a tribal endogamy, which still can be observed in Europe in the honor killings of Sadia Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim, who refused forced marriages with their cousins. The characters of Gülsüm, Mirjam and Sadia will no longer reproduce, they are extinct. They wanted to marry non-Muslims what even for Mirjam in religious endogamy was completely impossible. In seven million years, character deformation in this group of Homininae acquired gigantic proportions and is probably irreversible:

This brings us to the conclusion that killer Hominids are the result of harsh environment and selective breeding. They lost social empathic behavior and the system reinforced sadism in males and masochism in females.

Without selective breeding killer Hominids would return to more normal behavior if ended up in moderate circumstances. Hence it is not the harsh environment which causes killer Hominids but especially inbreeding and incest and otherwise, what selects certain psychological traits in the evolution. 

In harsh environments it is male power which is in charge. Tribes are always patriarchal, meaning that (polygamous) male heterosexuality is leading and 'other sexual roles' must follow. Hence primacy is always for monotheism (a single sexual role) in SM-dyad:

On the other hand, in more temperate and fertile regions and without inbreeding and incest, sexual roles become more or less equivalent since male power is not needed in the fight for food and wealth. Bonobos are an outstanding example of Vanilla-dyad where all sexual roles are allowed. This is called polytheism:

Although Christianity in its last stage can be compared with semi-polytheism in Vanilla-dyad, Western culture in temperate and fertile regions also has been very aggressive in the past. We conclude for humans it is far more complicated than for bonobos. 

But it is true in the evolution the bonobo population and Christianity have maintained normal psychological structure without any selection on character traits.

It is very doubtful if Muslims and Christians will ever assimilate because of fundamental differences in personality structure:


Seven million years of evolution created somewhat different species for Panini:

Chimpanzees are called Panini and human like creatures are called Hominini. Chimpanzees and Hominini diverged as Homininae from the common ancestor Hominidae, about 14 - 7 million years ago (mya). About 6-5 mya, Panini and Hominini split apart. Fewer than one million years ago the bonobo (Pan paniscus) and common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) species effectively separated as DNA evidence suggests.

Two African apes are the closest living relatives of humans: the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus). Although they are similar in many respects, bonobos and chimpanzees differ strikingly in key social and sexual behaviours1234, and for some of these traits they show more similarity with humans than with each other.

Here we report the sequencing and assembly of the bonobo genome to study its evolutionary relationship with the chimpanzee and human genomes. We find that more than three per cent of the human genome is more closely related to either the bonobo or the chimpanzee genome than these are to each other. These regions allow various aspects of the ancestry of the two ape species to be reconstructed. In addition, many of the regions that overlap genes may eventually help us understand the genetic basis of phenotypes that humans share with one of the two apes to the exclusion of the other.

From 7- 5 million years ago chimpanzees (Panini) and humans (Hominini) shared the same religious development. (But remember Panini did not definitely leave the forests). Note, both types had 400 cc brains and interbred, as they were the same species.

'Today, bonobos are found in only the Democratic Republic of Congo and there is no evidence that they have interbred with chimpanzees in equatorial Africa since they diverged, perhaps because the Congo River acted as a barrier to prevent the groups from mixing'.

'Why, then, have chimps not evolved this social structure? The answer may lie in the history of the habitats they occupy. Both species of primates live in tropical forests along the Zaire River -- chimps north of the river, bonobos to the south. Their environments seem to be quite similar today. But about 2.5 million years ago, there seems to have been a lengthy drought in southern Zaire that wiped out the preferred food plants of gorillas and sent the primates packing. After the drought ended, the forests returned, but the gorillas did not.[bonobos nowadays are without gorillas.]' 

'Chimpanzees [nowadays bonobos] in this environment south of the river had the forest to themselves, and could exploit the fiber foods that had previously been eaten by gorillas -- foods that are still eaten by gorillas to the north [chimps nowadays with gorillas]this additional food to tide them [bonobos] over between fruit trees, they could travel in larger, more stable parties, and form strong social bonds. They became bonobos.'

'On the north side of the river, the chimps had to share their niche with gorillaswhich eat the fiber foods. The chimps have to compete for fruit, and occasionally meat, food resources that tend to be widely scattered. Female chimps disperse into the forest with their infants to find enough to eat, and cannot spend time together to forge strong bonds. The changes in social behavior that occurred in response to this environmental factor may be what led chimps down a different evolutionary path, toward a society more prone to violence.' 

Here is stated that a harsh environment made less social and more aggressive chimpanzees than bonobos. It must be said chimpanzees also have some good points. So females are free to live in the forest on the edges of the tribe. And just like bonobos, young adolescent females may leave the group in search for other groups to settle. This is a strong argument against inbreeding but selective breeding of males remains. Now, random inbreeding is not the biggest problem, but selective breeding on psychological traits does.

Now we see the enormous difference with Islam where young females are treated like slaves which are not allowed to choose for genetic diversity. This gives the following rank order in 'equal sexual roles'. It is the Homininae rank order of civilization:

Note 1: Chimp females are free to live in the forest on the edges of the tribe finding their own food, simply because chimp males are not sexually interested 24/7 as human males.

Note 2:  Very young females may leave the group in search for other groups to settle. Chimp males other than a lot of Muslim males are not interested in sexually immature juveniles.

Psychological tests of Panini

'Overall this broad spectrum comparison of bonobo and chimpanzee cognition demonstrates that species differences in cognition are directly reflected in the most pronounced differences observed in their naturally occurring behavior. Each species outperformed the other on one cognitive scale and in the direction predicted by previous socio-ecological observations, even when controlling for effects of age (i.e. statistically and matching ages). 
Mirroring individual differences observed in theory of mind development in human children [5]the more cautious and socially tolerant bonobo outperformed chimpanzees on the theory of mind scale
Meanwhile, the prolific tool-using chimpanzee, whose survival is more dependent on extractive foraging, outperformed bonobos in the tool-use and causality scale. This pattern can potentially be interpreted as suggesting that bonobos are more skilled at solving problems requiring an understanding of social causality, while chimpanzees are more skilled at solving problems relating to physical causality.'
' In other words, while the two species are highly similar and only diverged 1–2 million years ago, the observed socio-ecological differences may have shaped each species psychology in predictable ways.'


Nowadays bonobos travel all the year from fruit place to fruit place. Meanwhile they eat fiber foods. They are intellectually very flexible and developed great capability for empathy, as Christians. But chimpanzees are prisoners of little areas and are unable to roam through the forests north of Congo River. Females did not communicate well what leads to spiritual poverty, to a lack of empathy and to sexual monocultures of chimp males in the last million years. 

Because the Congo River is a barrier between chimps and bonobos, they did not merge for a million years, and meanwhile they have got another faith (sexual roles) or got other genes, causing very different sexual habits. 

Without the Congo River and without the disappearance of Gorillas from the bonobo area, both subspecies probably would not have differed genetically. 

But nowadays chimps and bonobos probably
will not assimilate because of genetically very different psychological traits in their populations.

It might be possible bonobos would be massacred by chimps as they could cross the Congo River. 

Similarities between Muslims and chimpanzees are large, just as between bonobos and Christians. Distinguishing features include monotheism (SM-dyad) versus polytheism (Vanilla-dyad). But also the harsh climate of the desert versus fertile areas in temperate zones, and finally the most important: selective breeding.

Fortunately chimpanzees cannot cross the Congo River, and they have no idea bonobos have a much better life. They certainly would have butchered the bonobos.  But this obstacle does not apply to Muslims who long tried to conquer the temperate zones of Europe with it's fertile land. 

Annex I

Assumption 234: Selective breeding with Homininae.

Human family (Hominini) has about the same genome as chimpanzees (Panini). Both evolved as Homininae, from 7 to 4 million years ago. Because Homininae set the first steps towards human religion, chimpanzees are our natural control group.

And then it turns into the evolution, humans and chimpanzees developed the same remarkable split in religion. For the family of chimpanzees (Panini), this became clear with the split into common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus). About a similar division split Humans into Muslims and Christians. The behavior of Muslims is somewhat similar to that of common chimpanzees, while bonobos are more like Christians.

The split in Hominini is caused by the harsh environment of the desert (Paradise culture) versus the opulence of heavenly temperate regions (Christianity). And the split in Panini is caused by a shortage of food (common chimpanzee), against an abundant food supply for bonobos south of the Congo River.

Common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and Muslims (Islam) developed behavior definitely characterized by unequal sexual roles. Bonobos (Pan paniscus) and Christians, however, developed behavior with equivalent sexual relations:
Assumption 203: Sexual deprivation (poverty) strengthens the endogamous group. Promiscuity (wealth) strengthens the exogamous group.
Assumption 240: Polygamy leads to inbreeding in patriarchies (Islam) and to outbreeding in matriarchies (bonobos and elephants).

Moreover, in the evolution chimpanzees practiced selected breeding on their population by killing males, who sought for genetic diversity in other tribes. Only sadistic males survived defending genetic monoculture, though adolescent females were free to wander between tribes looking for genetic diversity.

In the evolution a worse development of selective breeding in Paradise culture (former Islam) culled all human characters not suited for inbreeding and incest, males and females. There, a population evolved with an excess of sadistic males and masochistic females.

Hence it is questionable if common chimpanzees and bonobos ever will assimilate. The same question arises with Muslims and Christians.
Assumption 204: Forcing a sexually deprived (poor) endogamous group to assimilate within a promiscuous (wealthy) exogamous group means civil war.


This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

No comments:

Post a Comment