(208) Genetic diversity and survival of the fittest

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive

Assumption 313: 

In nature there are two kinds of selection:

1: Sexual selection:
   - Sexual attraction: survival of the most attractive.
   - Sexual religion: survival of the most religious.

2: Natural selection: 
    - Survival of the fittest: survival of the most adaptive.
    - Survival of the strongest: survival of the most  
      powerful.



Sexual religion: survival of the most religious

Assumption 304: Religious interventions on sexual culture are always rational and realistic since they change the visible effects of first order time derivatives.

Assumption 305: With rational religious measures we mean the pursuit of realistic effects on sexual behavior AND the expectation of realistic results (rewards) from these effects given in the universe.

Assumption 306: With irrational religious measures we mean the pursuit of realistic effects on sexual behavior AND the expectation of unrealistic or magical results (rewards) from these effects, which are expected in some other universe.

Assumption 307: We think religious interventions are meant to steer sexual culture on the basis of first time order derivatives of sexual culture. Therefore religious interventions always aim for realistic effects. But religious expectations (rewards) from these effects can be realistic (in this universe) or unrealistic or magical (in some other universe).

I'am the victim of a religious measure (courtship) but can barely fly (natural selection)

Assumption 313: 
In nature there are two kinds of selection:
1: Sexual selection:
   - Sexual attraction: survival of the most attractive.
   - Sexual religion: survival of the most religious.
2: Natural selection: 
    - Survival of the fittest: survival of the most adaptive.
    - Survival of the strongest: survival of the most powerful.

Usually, species survive if sexual selection and natural selection are in line. Then, sexual selection delivers species which also survive as the fittest. But beautiful birds which can barely fly (sexual religion) might have no natural enemies, or inbreeding cultures (sexual religion) might multiply as mice (fertility stress like real mice). Then awful sexual cultures will survive as species too. 

What we see here is sexual religion sets the preconditions for survival of a species. That's why religion is so important. This means a good religion fosters genetic diversity and survival of the species. That's why exogamous cultures as Western society practice genetic diversity and military strength. 

Assumption 323: 'Genetic diversity' is promoted by giving all members of a population freedom of procreation. 

Assumption 324: The outbreeding instinct is the lust for genetic diversity. 

But a religion as Islam delivers insufficient genetic diversity and would normally die out:

In that case it must try to change the rules for natural selection and develop radical new weapons to fight other cultures. And indeed, Islam survived by developing a diametrically different morality from exogamous cultures.

In Western opinion Islam has a false and schizophrenic morality, Islam is completely untrustworthy, 'Islam' means lying (taqiya) against unbelievers, Islam slaughters the weakest (other sexual roles). So, only by the development of a completely horrifying morality Islam has been able to survive until now:

https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/03/08/india-in-1947-partition-of-india-sikhs-and-hindus-made-up-20-of-pakistan-today-they-are-1-combined/

We conclude human species with completely abnormal religions can survive by defeating other species by new weapons as betrayal and deception. Then sexual selection and natural selection are in line again.

Assumption 308: A species survives if sexual selection and natural selection are in line.




Genetic diversity

The primal law of animal religion is the commandment: Thou shalt reproduce in genetic diversity:

We see something very peculiar in primate groups which are ruled by Alpha males, which practice genetic monoculture for their own sake. On the other hand females in the periphery of the group secretly copulate with males from other groups (genetic diversity).

+

Fortunately, Alpha males are in charge but a few years and so there is no real inbreeding with quadruped Hominids:

But things changed dramatically with bipedal Homininae, which lost other tribes out of sight and were unable to exchange juvenile females.



Genetic diversity and survival of the fittest

For animal religion no wormholes into other universes are needed, no soul and no reincarnation exist. What we call 'religion' is a much later development caused by our cauliflower brain and in principle has nothing to do with the essence of religion as found in animals. 

Animal sexuality is the origin of human religion. Human religion has no intrinsic meaning, it comes down to pure magical thinking and projects into wormholes of a dearly desired parallel universe.

Assumption 323: 'Genetic diversity' is promoted by giving all members of a population the chance of procreation. 


Assumption 324: The outbreeding instinct is the lust for genetic diversity. 

Courtship contests (sexual religion) might deliver a random selection of the population with sufficient genetic diversity to survive as a species. But therefore, all males in the world must have the same chance to win the courtship and no endogamous barriers should be raised (Islam) m, -/:

Assumption 309: Religious measures - like courtship contests of birds - must lead to sufficient genetic variation as a necessary condition for survival of the fittest. 

We distinguish between genetic diversity and survival of the fittest. A genetic diverse population based on courtship behavior can still die out in a struggle for life with other species which selected stronger males, without manners. 

Assumption 310: Survival of a species implies genetic diversity. But genetic diversity  is no sufficient condition for survival. 

Assumption 311: Religious measures without sufficient genetic variation nor the condition of survival of the fittest, lead to phenotypical forms of inbreeding which give no guaranty for survival.

Assumption 312: Religious measures of animals which survived as a species just accidentally selected sufficient variation and fulfilled the demands of survival of the fittest. A lot of species must have died out because of selecting inadequate religious rules. 

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

(207) Religious measures

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive

I'm the victim of a religious measure: Courtship

We rejected higher order time derivatives as explanation for human religion. We returned to the black box of the human mind itself. We returned to B.F. Skinner, in whom we found earlier 'operant conditioning' and 'intermittent reinforcement' as most promising in understanding human religion.

But we kept religious measures as developed from the first order time derivative of sexual culture:

Further we concluded the rational - irrational dimension as the best explanation for the difference between animal and human religion. But we are not quite certain:





And now we must calibrate the rational - irrational dimension in practice. Is this the right standard? 

Assumption 304: Religious interventions on sexual culture are always rational and realistic since they change the visible effects of first order time derivatives.

Assumption 305: With rational religious measures we mean the pursuit of realistic effects on sexual behavior AND the expectation of realistic results (rewards) from these effects given in the universe. 

Below, pedophilia as religious measure is able to foster inbreeding as a realistic effect. And the result is a realistic reward (pedophilia) in this universe:

Perpetual orgasm in this lifetime = pedophilia

Assumption 306: With irrational religious measures we mean the pursuit of realistic effects on sexual behavior AND the expectation of unrealistic or magical results (rewards) from these effects, which are expected in some other universe.

The religious measure developed from the second derivative of sexual culture 
(perpetual orgasm NR 1) and the first derivative of pedophilia, has also a realistic effect on inbreeding but the result (reward) can only be realized after reincarnation. It is the expectation of an unrealistic or magical result:

Assumption 301: The first order time derivative of sexual culture (inbreeding), led to pedophilia as religious measure rewarding males for accepting inbreeding, in which they lost sexual freedom and were forced to copulate with their cousins.

Assumption 302: Perpetual orgasm is the refined eternal version of pedophilia, originating from sexual culture (inbreeding).

Assumption 307: We think religious interventions are meant to steer sexual culture on the basis of first time order derivatives of sexual culture. Therefore religious interventions always aim for realistic effects. But religious expectations (rewards) from these effects can be realistic (in this universe) or unrealistic or magical (in some other universe).

Up to now we think animals likely have no unrealistic or magical expectations from
realistic effects. If they do they must believe in the soul or in reincarnation. Of course they can think unrealistically in quite another way but that is not the subject of this study. For example, it might be they do not understand their situation and therefore take wrong and unrealistic religious measures.

Courtship as a religious measure of birds

Can barely fly

Animals (and humans) can take rational and realistic religious measures.

Assumption 305: With rational religious measures we mean the pursuit of realistic effects on sexual behavior AND the expectation of realistic results (rewards) from these effects given in the universe. 

Female birds have a lot of different means to select the most impressive males, for example they attend to courtship behavior. For birds, 'survival of the most religious' means the procreation of males with beautiful colors, expressive feathers and the right courtship manners. Also this is an example of a religious measure steering sexual culture into whatever direction. This means animal religion has no prescribed direction, since every sexual lust can be satisfied. Religion is the effectuation of a sexual lust.

So, female birds selecting partners with perfect courtship manners are effectuating a religious measure. This measure affects sexual behavior in a realistic and meaningful way. Also the intended result is realistic: females get exactly the fulfillment of their dreams, the fulfilling of a sexual lust, to get the most attractive male. This religious measure is rational since it gives a realistic result in the universe.

In human religion we mostly have irrational and magical measures to achieve the impossible in trying to cross the border between the earthly and the parallel universe (the soul and reincarnation into the universes):







In conclusion:

We saw how human religion developed from animal religion and we conclude: there simply are no universal rules for the modification of sexual culture. 

Every instinctive wish, e.g. beautiful feathers, by which male birds can barely fly, or the sexual desire of Muslims to proclaim tribal identity by inbreeding, by which the species dies out. 

Everything is possible and there are no fundamental differences between animals and humans, except maybe the rational - irrational dimension. However, from the latter I am not quite convinced it is the right caesura. In the end of our search to the origin of religion we might conclude there is not the slightest difference between animal and human religion.

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

(206) Alienation from reality by cauliflower brain

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/

Number Archive

Higher order time derivatives cannot really explain the dimensionality of human religion. 'Alienation from reality' by our cauliflower brain is the 
real cause.

Higher order time derivatives (earthly and parallel reincarnation) have but a vague relation with the original inbreeding culture, since they are irrationally and not precisely defined. For example, the relation between reincarnation and inbreeding is questionable, since the former is a magical concept and might not exist at all. 

On the other hand, the relation between inbreeding and pedophilia (first order) is real and well established. But then, perpetual orgasm (second order: afterlife, reincarnation) must be the derivative of pedophilia while perpetual orgasm NR 1 is an irrational concept:

This means higher order derivatives give no real information. We must come up with a better idea.

We better accept bipeds (inclusive humans) developed religious measures from first order time derivatives of whatever sexual culture. So, we keep the conclusion that religion steers sexual culture:

Quadrupeds sexual culture high in the trees is only stable just by religious measures and so they have a zero order derivative as end result, not to begin with: 

But now we plunge into a different problem. We earlier concluded inbreeding as the primal sexual culture of the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc). And we accepted Muslims still take the first order time derivative of this inbreeding culture. But Christianity and numerous other sexual cultures do not adhere inbreeding anymore and this already for a very long time. Then, if their first order derivatives are not taken from inbreeding any longer, from which sexual culture are they taken in the second place?

But beware, since also Christians are not completely free from inbreeding genes. They have still fertility stress and want families with a lot of children. Also they reject homosexuality from which do not come too many children, they rejected birth control and abortion and so there are a lot of remnants left from Paradise culture, say monotheism.

But they really tried:

If their first order derivatives are not taken from inbreeding any longer, from which sexual culture are they taken in the second place?

The answer is: inbreeding remains the primal sexual culture of mankind. But sexual culture changes over time and humans simply take the first order time derivative of any prevailing sexual culture. The problem is: how has sexual culture changed over time from inbreeding to other cultures? Since therefore we invented higher order derivatives in the first place.

Higher order time derivatives were our first explanation of changing sexual cultures, floating away from inbreeding. Thereby we took advantage of the assumption that higher order derivatives came down to unrealistic, magical, fake derivatives. They were no real derivatives and therefore sexual cultures changed dramatically of character. And that's how we escaped from primal inbreeding.

But because we give up higher order derivatives, we must abandon the primal inbreeding culture in a different way. Actually, we use the same explanatory dimensions as with higher order derivatives - irrational, unrealistic, magical, fake dimensions - but now placed into the human mind itself. So, from now on the human brain itself is the black box changing sexual culture over time. Well, that's a brilliant finding 😊. We are back to basics, back to B.F. Skinner with operant conditioning and intermittent reinforcement:

(4) Human religion as operant conditioning
(181) Intermittent reinforcement of religion

So our explanation does not come from higher order derivatives any longer, but from the inherent development of the human brain. This steered sexual culture more and more by irrational religious rules, caused by the irrational expansion of the human brain. That's why religion is the canary in the coal mine of human schizophrenia.

                                             


Alienation from reality by cauliflower brain

In the evolution religion removed further and farther from reality, exchanging more and more rationality with magical irrationality, exchanging the real world with a fictitious shadow world. So the underlying dimension must be the transition from rationality to irrationality or to magical thinking.

Of course that's right, since the afterlife lies in another universe, in the parallel universe. So, human religion must be defined as the alienation from reality in our universe, the specialty of cauliflower brains:

But, are we making a causal error here? Religion does not necessarily alienate from reality as an unavoidable natural process. Human religion is the tragically result of the expansion of the cauliflower brain which offered many senseless neurons and synapses. Superfluous brain connections delivered millions of magical degrees of freedom lost from any reality. Then, a psychotic and schizophrenic worldview automatically developed, which we euphemistically called 'religion'. And guess what, humans are proud of their recessive disorder which is protected even in the constitution. They have no idea of founding their society on a flight of fancy, a figment of the imagination.

Our religions are the byproduct of our cauliflower brain in the first place We are the most crazy animals in the world. That's why human religion must be seen as the canary of the coal mine of human's innate schizophrenia.

For many believers religion is the last truth above reality. They are fooling themselves with inherited religious fake dimensions. Of course they can rationally drive a car and do other things, but the shadow over their existence, their existential belief places everything within a morbid religious framework. And that's what makes people a dangerous species.

Most people are latent schizophrenics plagued by sinister after thoughts, by dark attitudes about the existence, by their inherited religious beliefs, as the inbreeding instinct of the Muslim society:

Humans are insane animals and that's why they are really dangerous. Animals flee for them. Humans are cruel in the name of God; they are the gruesome killers of peaceful animals.

Why this sinister monologue? Because I am going to convert common sense into its opposite. These are the animals that think realistically and people are irrational beings.

Animals survive by rational measures derived from first order derivatives of sexual culture, because they need a strictly rational brain to calculate their chances for survival. Magical thinking animals are extinct.

But Homo sapiens is at the top of the hierarchy and can afford to think irrationally for half his life. People do not die out from magical thinking any longer, they simple breed harder like mice to avoid fertility stress.

This might imply Homo naledi (2,3 Ma - 335 ka; 550cc) had already the basic structure of the Hominin brain without our infamous cauliflower expansion.







The first dichotomy with the animal world is the soul. The soul is just like fake higher order derivatives an illegitimate escape from reality. It is the inadmissible bridge to another universe, to the parallel universe, to a schizophrenic worldview:





Then this is our new model of the religious evolution of the Hominins:

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.