Basic Dimension
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
In the fifties of last century there was a form of religious compartmentalization in the Netherlands, also known as pillarization to sustain the morality of the Dutch. In above picture it is seen most of the views of the Dutch were pleasantly canalized into just four or five ways. It shows the grip of the endogamous core on the people which simplified the public debate.
Assumption 325: Religious compartmentalization.
Socio-religious compartmentalization is seen as the reduction of the public opinion (total religious variance of n-individuals) into a few religious tendencies (main effects). If this panoply of Christian religions (endogamous cores) disappears, society is left with millions of individual opinions which are uncontrolled and cannot easily be steered by.
Additionally, individuals are confirmed in their personal opinions by visiting only websites of their own kind. This way Isis has become the new endogamous core of young Muslims on the Internet.
So, formerly an n-dimensional individual space of n degrees of freedom was reduced to a m-variable subspace of about five sorts of Christianity, which was reduced further to one main factor, namely Christianity.
But today we see the reversal of the clustering of opinions. Reduction of degrees of freedom fails miserably and n-individuals really need an n-dimensional space to express themselves.
But this simply means any reduction of information - e.g. the forming of compromises - has become nearly impossible. People are confirmed and bolstered in crazy opinions by new endogamous cores, e.g. their beloved weblogs.
In the first place, we know Christianity will degenerate into individualism in a natural way. Secondly, the state of the art of communication creates billions of bits of information which are nearly impossible to integrate.
Thus, the inability of society to reduce abundant individual information leads to a Babel-like confusion, which will cause numerous unsolvable conflicts ending in civil war.
We conclude the individualization of society is the first cause of the information crisis:
But there is a second cause in the evolution of mankind.
The cauliflower brain of Homo sapiens
The sick overgrowth of the human brain caused an enormous influence of the unconscious on human actions. It also causes the insane and unreasonable emotions of policor (Political Correctness, PC), the left wing of society. This process has been treated in extension on this site.
Therefore we have about to square the effect of individualization to estimate the total damage on nowadays society: individualization times human sick brain growth:
The tragic cauliflower brain of Homo sapiens
The more cauliflower brain humans develop the bigger their unconscious thinking. There has been a moment in the evolution that humanlike creatures possessed only the basic display of a fairly rational brain. I think Homo naledi (2.3 Ma - 335ka; 550cc) might be a good example:
But it is Homo sapiens who accelerated to an abnormal brain with billions of excessive nerve connections making any overview impossible. Humans had to develop a pointer of consciousness not to drown in a sea of unconscious madness. In the past this pointer has been named 'the Homunculus' in psychology. The Homunculus is just a concept to underline the perceived impossibility to control the cauliflower brain. As a wild guess people thought 90% of the brain is unconscious, but it must be much more:
The tragedy is humans are very proud of their brain. They have got an excessive amount of magical synapses and neurons to invent the most crazy concepts as for example reincarnation and all kinds of magical religions. The development of religious concepts can be derived from the table below:
The interaction between growing individuality and unconscious thinking
For this discussion it is important to realize the interaction between growing individualization and unconscious thinking on the population. This interaction takes place mainly for the group called 'policor' (PC):
These are the adherents of the European Union and of left politics in the United States. At this moment they form a risk for the survival of humanity and the white race in particular. They unconsciously regress to white supremacy racism in which they remove white people from universities and from official functions. Fighting discrimination, BTW.
Notice, the removal of white males from the centers of society is in agreement with the removal of white males from the endogamous cores. In our view this is the disapproval of Vanilla-dyad in favor of SM-dyad. Remember, it might seem silly but it is okay if the model is not disconfirmed.
Just like European policor, which fosters Islamic discrimination despite forbidding discrimination in the constitution, liberals in the United States explicitly discriminate the white race to favor other ethnicities. Exactly this is meant with unconsciously pursuing what one officially says to reject:
Accusations of white collar racism in the Netherlands of last century:
In Europe, Muslims and policor respond unconsciously to each other. In our view they cherish a hidden romance which is completely unrealistic and fictitious:
Muslims live in a magical and unrealistic world in which they are thrown back and forth between reincarnation into the earthly and the parallel universe:
It is the unaware attraction between sexual extremes: Christian masochism and Islamic sadism. This all makes reasonable consultation of former Christians and Muslims difficult if not impossible.
It has been said multiple times that policor and Islam are driven by unaware and unconscious lusts and that policor actually means 'former Christians':
Superficially, the conflict between policor and anti-policor handles about politics but it goes much deeper and is fundamental to the survival of the Western world. The extinction of overblown Christianity starts a whole new religious cycle for humanity:
This is a horrible development in which policor tries to embrace Islam as its new sadistic core:
This process is coming to the United States too, unless they timely learn their lesson from Islamized Europe:
The political separation in right and left actually means a separation into different religious groups, in which mostly females fought free from religious domination:
(NB: LGBTQQI2SAA is 'other sexual roles' housing in the periphery of the exogamous mantle.)
But in the rebound they unconsciously grasped to violate their inherited nature which forces them to find a new sadistic sexual core. Then they say one thing but do another. Policor females wants non white males in their endogamous core. They hate Vanilla-dyad and fantasize unconsciously about SM-dyad:
Now one can disagree, but then one has to find another parsimonious explanation for the obvious inconsistencies in policor and liberal's behavior. As mentioned before European policor fights to eliminate discrimination in the constitution and to foster multiculturalism.
But in fact they developed a two-tear juridical system which benefits Muslims in the first place. Also they did not create multiculturalism but installed an Islamic monoculture in most European cities.
As mentioned before American liberals say to promote anti-discrimination but cannot avoid to use color as main political instrument. In fact they use pure discrimination to attain their goals, but apparently have no idea they are completely inconsistent and unbelievable.
Both groups installed a two-tear system of justice in which liberals and anti-liberals, policor and anti-policor got a different treatment. What happens now in America is usual practice in Western Europe already for decades.
Now, the deeper reason for the emotional merge of liberal American white women (exogamous mantle) with colored males (endogamous core) might be the latter are substitutes for Muslims (colored males). This, because former Christian women do not yearn to Muslims in the first place but to a new sadistic endogamous core.
.jpg)
http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
In the fifties of last century there was a form of religious compartmentalization in the Netherlands, also known as pillarization to sustain the morality of the Dutch. In above picture it is seen most of the views of the Dutch were pleasantly canalized into just four or five ways. It shows the grip of the endogamous core on the people which simplified the public debate.
Assumption 325: Religious compartmentalization.
Socio-religious compartmentalization is seen as the reduction of the public opinion (total religious variance of n-individuals) into a few religious tendencies (main effects). If this panoply of Christian religions (endogamous cores) disappears, society is left with millions of individual opinions which are uncontrolled and cannot easily be steered by.
Additionally, individuals are confirmed in their personal opinions by visiting only websites of their own kind. This way Isis has become the new endogamous core of young Muslims on the Internet.
So, formerly an n-dimensional individual space of n degrees of freedom was reduced to a m-variable subspace of about five sorts of Christianity, which was reduced further to one main factor, namely Christianity.
But today we see the reversal of the clustering of opinions. Reduction of degrees of freedom fails miserably and n-individuals really need an n-dimensional space to express themselves.
But this simply means any reduction of information - e.g. the forming of compromises - has become nearly impossible. People are confirmed and bolstered in crazy opinions by new endogamous cores, e.g. their beloved weblogs.
In the first place, we know Christianity will degenerate into individualism in a natural way. Secondly, the state of the art of communication creates billions of bits of information which are nearly impossible to integrate.
Thus, the inability of society to reduce abundant individual information leads to a Babel-like confusion, which will cause numerous unsolvable conflicts ending in civil war.
We conclude the individualization of society is the first cause of the information crisis:
But there is a second cause in the evolution of mankind.
The cauliflower brain of Homo sapiens
The sick overgrowth of the human brain caused an enormous influence of the unconscious on human actions. It also causes the insane and unreasonable emotions of policor (Political Correctness, PC), the left wing of society. This process has been treated in extension on this site.
Therefore we have about to square the effect of individualization to estimate the total damage on nowadays society: individualization times human sick brain growth:
The tragic cauliflower brain of Homo sapiens
The more cauliflower brain humans develop the bigger their unconscious thinking. There has been a moment in the evolution that humanlike creatures possessed only the basic display of a fairly rational brain. I think Homo naledi (2.3 Ma - 335ka; 550cc) might be a good example:
But it is Homo sapiens who accelerated to an abnormal brain with billions of excessive nerve connections making any overview impossible. Humans had to develop a pointer of consciousness not to drown in a sea of unconscious madness. In the past this pointer has been named 'the Homunculus' in psychology. The Homunculus is just a concept to underline the perceived impossibility to control the cauliflower brain. As a wild guess people thought 90% of the brain is unconscious, but it must be much more:
The tragedy is humans are very proud of their brain. They have got an excessive amount of magical synapses and neurons to invent the most crazy concepts as for example reincarnation and all kinds of magical religions. The development of religious concepts can be derived from the table below:
The interaction between growing individuality and unconscious thinking
For this discussion it is important to realize the interaction between growing individualization and unconscious thinking on the population. This interaction takes place mainly for the group called 'policor' (PC):
These are the adherents of the European Union and of left politics in the United States. At this moment they form a risk for the survival of humanity and the white race in particular. They unconsciously regress to white supremacy racism in which they remove white people from universities and from official functions. Fighting discrimination, BTW.
Notice, the removal of white males from the centers of society is in agreement with the removal of white males from the endogamous cores. In our view this is the disapproval of Vanilla-dyad in favor of SM-dyad. Remember, it might seem silly but it is okay if the model is not disconfirmed.
Just like European policor, which fosters Islamic discrimination despite forbidding discrimination in the constitution, liberals in the United States explicitly discriminate the white race to favor other ethnicities. Exactly this is meant with unconsciously pursuing what one officially says to reject:
Accusations of white collar racism in the Netherlands of last century:
http://www.meervrijheid.nl/index.php?pagina=1428http://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl/2011/01/croughs-wetten-van-het-progressieve-denken/
The first law of Bart Croughs
1. The law of the abject West: "In a conflict between Western and non-Western, the progressive intellectual chooses for non-western."
Translated into our terms:
1: The law of exogamous Christianity: "In a conflict between exogamous Christianity and endogamous Islam, Christians choose for infiltration into Islamic endogamy by appeasement."
In Europe, Muslims and policor respond unconsciously to each other. In our view they cherish a hidden romance which is completely unrealistic and fictitious:
Muslims live in a magical and unrealistic world in which they are thrown back and forth between reincarnation into the earthly and the parallel universe:
It is the unaware attraction between sexual extremes: Christian masochism and Islamic sadism. This all makes reasonable consultation of former Christians and Muslims difficult if not impossible.
This process is coming to the United States too, unless they timely learn their lesson from Islamized Europe:
The political separation in right and left actually means a separation into different religious groups, in which mostly females fought free from religious domination:
(NB: LGBTQQI2SAA is 'other sexual roles' housing in the periphery of the exogamous mantle.)
But in the rebound they unconsciously grasped to violate their inherited nature which forces them to find a new sadistic sexual core. Then they say one thing but do another. Policor females wants non white males in their endogamous core. They hate Vanilla-dyad and fantasize unconsciously about SM-dyad:
Now one can disagree, but then one has to find another parsimonious explanation for the obvious inconsistencies in policor and liberal's behavior. As mentioned before European policor fights to eliminate discrimination in the constitution and to foster multiculturalism.
But in fact they developed a two-tear juridical system which benefits Muslims in the first place. Also they did not create multiculturalism but installed an Islamic monoculture in most European cities.
As mentioned before American liberals say to promote anti-discrimination but cannot avoid to use color as main political instrument. In fact they use pure discrimination to attain their goals, but apparently have no idea they are completely inconsistent and unbelievable.
Both groups installed a two-tear system of justice in which liberals and anti-liberals, policor and anti-policor got a different treatment. What happens now in America is usual practice in Western Europe already for decades.
Now, the deeper reason for the emotional merge of liberal American white women (exogamous mantle) with colored males (endogamous core) might be the latter are substitutes for Muslims (colored males). This, because former Christian women do not yearn to Muslims in the first place but to a new sadistic endogamous core.
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment