http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/
Number Archive
Assumption 275: Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is a religious instrument of African cultures, which will likely develop into outbreeding societies, just because they are no notorious inbreeding cultures like Islam. But until now inbreeding cultures made much more progress in their outer layer of religious endogamy, where males and females have about the same rights to choose an Islamic partner.
Assumption 276: On leaving Africa inbreeding cultures likely entered a harsh desert like environment in the Levant or on the Arabian Peninsula, which changed sexual culture and religion dramatically. Desert life facilitated rigid cultures with order and regularity needed for inbreeding across generations. In later period increased tribal density caused to enlarge the number of inbred bodies to outnumber neighbouring hostile tribes with reincarnated ancestors. A regular society and the need for population growth were impetus for the notorious incubator farms of family semen which are still characteristic for nowadays Islam.
Assumption 277: The last possible origin of cousin marriages lies in the Arabian Peninsula about 50,000 years ago, where first human families (mtDNA =L3N) could not exchange fresh juvenile females with other tribes and desperately had to find new formulas to exchange females within just a few families. This measure from the time derivative of sexual culture might have become instinctive 'religion' for Muslims.
Assumption 278: About 40.000 years ago Homo sapiens (mtDNA = L3N) returned from the Arabian Peninsula and Europe to North Africa, where they developed as Berbers or Imazighen.
Assumption 280: Three elements likely caused the emergence of the Muslim instinct, which is male as well as female kin bonded in nuDNA to inbreeding and incest. This mutational abnormality is unprecedented in other inbreeding cultures, which are only bonded in the male lineage and where females are refreshed completely every generation (chimps, bonobos, Australopithecus africanus, Neanderthals and Aboriginals). This can be seen from mtDNA which is the same for males but different for females, which also have different nuDNA:
1: Inbreeding promotes tribal identity by genetic immortality in descendants since the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc), the primal human-creature religion. Tribal identity revives in Muslim cultures in Western society today. Tribal identity is male and female kin bonded.
2: And since Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc) inbreeding also promotes the earthly reincarnation of Muslim fathers into descendants of their children.
3: And last but not least on the Arabian Peninsula (50 ka; 1400cc; mtDNA L3N) inbreeding was the only way to survive without the possibility to exchange fresh juvenile females. Nowadays perpetuation of this behavior despite adequate fresh juvenile females indicates an inbreeding-instinct mutation.
In the Arabian Peninsula, 50 thousand years ago, there were no other people and there was no central public administration and therefore these 150 pioneers lost track of juvenile descendants of the group. Likely sub-tribes fanned out across the Peninsula in a very early stage and did not keep track on each other. They must have built a symbolic wall around their own subgroup (endogamous tribal mantle) and let no uncontrolled females escape to other groups. So, they must have developed their notoriously hostile relations among Bedouin tribes already in an early stage of evolution.
----------------------------
Climate change in Northern Africa
Assumption 330: Haplo-groups N from L3N and M from L3M, both groups from mtDNA, are sibling-groups what means both might be connected with the inbreeding instinct in nuDNA.
It appears climate change has nothing to do with the difference between L2 = FGM and inbreeding = L3N. Climate was the same in North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. But the dry climate might have been a legitimate reason for further migration of L3M into Asia.
Well, then there's just one classification criterion left and that's tribal density in a following article. Tribal density will explain the difference between FGM and Inbreeding.
Dr Rick Potts
Smitsonian Institution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRk_gcNf7jo
L2
About 70.000 years ago (90-55 Kya) Homo sapiens (200 ka; 1440cc) migrated from the mixed wet climate of Middle Africa to the dry climate of North-West Africa (L2):
Assumption 278: About 40.000 years ago Homo sapiens (mtDNA = L3N) returned from the Arabian Peninsula and Europe to North Africa, where they developed as Berbers or Imazighen.
[The last moment to form the Muslim inbreeding instinct must have been about 45 thousand years ago on the Arabian Peninsula (Saudi Arabia), though it is not certain for L3N might have been formed earlier in Africa. Also, it might have entered the world along the Nile and through the Levant (Israel) in the first wave Out of Africa (115.000 - 130.000 ya).]
- Last ice age and the colder climate (WIKI):
The Last Glacial Period (LGP) occurred from the end of the Eemian interglacial to the end of the Younger Dryas, encompassing the period c. 115,000 – c. 11,700 years ago. This most recent glacial period is part of a larger pattern of glacial and interglacial periods known as the Quaternary glaciation extending from c. 2,588,000 years ago to present.[1] The definition of the Quaternary as beginning 2.58 Ma is based on the formation of the Arctic ice cap. The Antarctic ice sheet began to form earlier, at about 34 Ma, in the mid-Cenozoic (Eocene–Oligocene extinction event). The term Late Cenozoic Ice Age is used to include this early phase.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_N_(mtDNA)
Haplogroup N (mtDNA)
Assumption 330: Haplo-groups N from L3N and M from L3M, both groups from mtDNA, are sibling-groups what means both might be connected with the inbreeding instinct in nuDNA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_N_(mtDNA)
Origins
Does not exclude earlier minor migrations, since:
The major competing hypothesis of "recent single origin" has been the multiregional origin of modern humans, which envisions a wave of Homo sapiens migrating earlier from Africa and interbreeding with local Homo erectus populations in multiple regions of the globe.[3][4]
They likely went through the Levant (Israel) 130,000 ya but this is also an interesting picture:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJdT6QcSbQ0
In the 2010s, the discovery of evidence of archaic admixture of modern humans outside of Africa with Neanderthals and Denisovans has complicated the picture.[5] As of 2011, it appears likely that there were two waves of migration out of Africa, the first taking place between 130,000–115,000 years ago via northern Africa,[6][7][8][9] which appears to have mostly died out or retreated (although there is some evidence of a presence of modern humans in China about 80,000 years ago),[10] and a second via the so-called Southern Route, following the southern coastline of Asia, which led to the lasting colonization of Eurasia and Australia by around 50,000 years ago. Europe was populated by an early offshoot which settled the Near East and Europe (post-Toba hypothesis).[11][12]
Toba disaster: 75.000 ya.
Anyway it seems Homo sapiens returned to Africa 40,000 - 50,000 years ago into a very dry Africa.
Lake Malawi Basin dry-wet fluctuation
Below we see again climate change from wet to dry starting about 60,000 ya:
This article explores the hypothesis that key human adaptations evolved in response to environmental instability. This idea was developed during research conducted by Dr. Rick Potts of the Smithsonian’s Human Origins Program. Natural selection was not always a matter of ‘survival of the fittest’ but also survival of those most adaptable to changing surroundings. [Well, that's the same, BD]
Warm-cold fluctuation over 10 million years
It is found by research into Oxygen isotope there is an extreme increase in climate variability over the last 10 million years, which might have promoted human evolution:
Notice this is not about dry/wet but about warm/cold:
http://humanorigins.si.edu/research/climate-and-human-evolution/climate-effects-human-evolution
Climate variability forced human creature to find new ways to survive:
Well, this information was useful for our insight in human development and human religion in particular.
Somehow, the ice age caused FGM.
First, we make a sort of timeline:
- Ice ages:
- Last ice age and the colder climate (WIKI):
The Last Glacial Period (LGP) occurred from the end of the Eemian interglacial to the end of the Younger Dryas, encompassing the period c. 115,000 – c. 11,700 years ago. This most recent glacial period is part of a larger pattern of glacial and interglacial periods known as the Quaternary glaciation extending from c. 2,588,000 years ago to present.[1] The definition of the Quaternary as beginning 2.58 Ma is based on the formation of the Arctic ice cap. The Antarctic ice sheet began to form earlier, at about 34 Ma, in the mid-Cenozoic (Eocene–Oligocene extinction event). The term Late Cenozoic Ice Age is used to include this early phase.
The last glacial period is sometimes colloquially referred to as the "last ice age", though this use is incorrect because an ice age is a longer period of cold temperature in which year-round ice sheets are present near one or both poles. Glacials are colder phases within an ice age in which glaciers advance; glacials are separated by interglacials.
Thus, the end of the last glacial period, which was about 11,700 years ago, is not the end of the last ice age since extensive year-round ice persists in Antarctica and Greenland. Over the past few million years the glacial-interglacial cycles have been "paced" by periodic variations in the Earth's orbit via Milankovitch cycles.
Female Genital Mutilation Is Also A European Issue
At least 200 million women and girls have undergone female genital mutilation worldwide, with some 600,000 survivors estimated to be living in Europe alone, according to the End FGN European Network.
The terms female genital mutilation (FGM) and female genital cutting (FGC) are often used interchangeably. The latter is preferred in order to promote dialogue and collaboration across cultural contexts due to being less judgemental and disrespectful of communities that use the practice, while also encompassing a wider range of surgeries. The term FGM stresses the harmful nature of the practice, which according to the WHO, has no health benefits.
The following map, via Statista's Anna Fleck, is based on End FGN’s estimations, drawn from a number of reports published between 2015 and 2020. According to the network, data on the topic in Europe is lacking and different surveys can be hard to compare due to differing methodologies.
You will find more infographics at Statista
Of the data that does exist, analysts suspect the United Kingdom to have the highest number of FGM/C survivors in Europe, with 137,000 cases calculated as of 2020. Other countries with relatively high numbers of cases are France, Italy, Germany and the Netherlands.
FGM/C is carried out in most regions around the world. According to the FGM/C Research Initiative, prevalence is particularly high in a number of sub-Saharan countries, although to varying degrees. For example, Somalia records a prevalence rate of 99 percent while Uganda is just 0.3 percent. It's important to note that prevalence varies considerably within countries, and as a practice specific to different ethnic communities, can cross national borders.
Rates are also high in parts of Asia, including Malaysia (83-85 percent), Indonesia (49 percent) and among the Bohra community in India (75 percent). In the Middle East, the FGM/C Research Initiative also highlights Iraqi Kurdistan (42.8 percent) and Kuwait (38 percent), while noting that prevalence can be high among diaspora populations around the world too.
Although the UN reports that the number of cases of FGM have seen a significant decline across 31 countries with nationally representative prevalence data over the past three decades, the organization stresses that this progress is far from uniform, with some countries also not achieving it.
The state of FGM/C has limited data in other countries, but campaigners are confident that education and awareness on the topic is increasing, as Carlien Scheele, Director of the European Institute for Gender Equality, explains: “EIGE’s latest estimations of the number of girls at risk of FGM show that legislation and campaigns work. The absolute number of girls at risk has gotten bigger because there are more girls from FGM-practising countries living in the EU, but affected communities are increasingly opposed to the practice and frequently lead efforts to eliminate it.”
.jpg){kind=small}
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
No comments:
Post a Comment