(517) The amygdala is the asymptote of human religion

 Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

Number Archive 

(517) The amygdala is the asymptote of human religion

The amygdala is the asymptote of human religion

There has always been the suspicion that religion could be a sexual disorder. But what would be the self-propelled force? What could be the stimulus-response mechanism? 

It could be because of the amygdala, which, as a benchmark, or as a reference point, could be the reward for religion. This means that religions develop and asymptotically converge on precisely the specific amygdala of a specific group of males claiming that this is religion in the name of God, although formulated in human religion style, in lies of the conscious, so there are double standards:

Christianity: Masochism

And anyone who asymptotically reaches their innate amygdala will find themselves in an ecstatic state.  It's a sexual state, but then esotherized in the conscious, but they don't realize. They are fused with their God, their gods, their innate mixture of thousands of gods from evolution. 

Religious euphoria is therefore the supreme bliss of merging conscious lies with unconscious sexuality. We all know it, but we can't quite put our finger on it.

So never try to take away someone's god, because then you haven't understood what's going on...

(4) Human religion as operant conditioning

' The neocortex of bipedal primates has expanded dramatically over the past millions of years, partly to counterbalance the uninhibited and uncontrolled sexuality in the limbic system.'

The  psychological mechanism used is operant conditioning from B.F. Skinner.  

With all kinds of procedures one can influence behavior by operant conditioning. Operant conditioning means that the individual has to take some particular behavior to attain the reward. A pigeon must peck in some order to get the grain. His behavior 'operates' on the environment to get a reward. Hence, it is called operant behavior.

Males don't realize they have an amygdala as a benchmark. They try out various religious practices and find a religion they like for one reason or another. But it's certainly not what females want, females don't like male "religion" but are indoctrinated. So the amygdala must be the reward males give themselves, and females have to accept that.

(181) Intermittent reinforcement of religion

Intermittent reinforcement is the secret key to religion

It doesn't matter that their God doesn't exist, because he rewards them with intermittent reinforcement, just like B.F. Skinner did with his pigeons, which stopped responding when a grain of corn was no longer offered as a reward, but did respond when it arrived intermittently. Therefore, intermittent reinforcement is the driving force behind religion.

So when we pray to our shared illusion every year for a good harvest and at random this comes true, we believe in God much more strongly than if there is a good harvest every year. Bad harvests are then simply seen as God's punishment. We simply have no respect for a God who always rewards us because too much sugar hurts our teeth. This means we NEED punishment, we NEED masochism to feel fine, males and females. Humans NEED SM-dyad.

It is our amygdala which contains our hereditary God illusion, of which the Superego is only the image in our neocortex:

And especially by inbreeding cultures, fragments of earlier gods are preserved as misunderstood partial instincts in the amygdala. And this as long as remnants of inbreeding are still in our genes (limbic brain), plaguing and terrorizing our lives where they spoil sexual pleasure, i.e., surrender sensitivity to brutal sexual SM violence against women.

This concerns the Muslim population, which has perpetuated its inbreeding legacy for 1,400 years by forcing Muslim women to marry Muslim men. Of course, the disclaimer here is again that this analysis only describes the basic trends, and numerous exceptions and variations on the rule exist.

But the same also happens with outbreeding cultures, although there reincarnation cannot result in honor killings and polytheism does not lead to misogyny.

In polytheism, males have equal relationships with the Gods and males are thought to have heterosexual Superegos with whom they compete with the Gods for females. But they also have homosexual tendencies and males are not always choosy. 

But in monotheism, males stand in juxtaposition, having a subordinate and submissive relationship with their God. While these two roles should be heterosexual, men still exhibit characteristically creepy behavior stemming from a subservient fiction in their amygdala, something women are not supposed to see.

This means that in Desert Religions, Muslim and Christian males, just like females, have a masochistic submissive relationship with their God. While these same husbands in Islam have a reverse submissive SM-dyad with their wives. Therefore, everyone feels and understands that something must be wrong in Abrahamic religions.