(519) Monotheism ran into its own sword: masochism

 Basic Dimension

https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com

Number Archive 

(519) Monotheism ran into its own sword: masochism

Monotheism ran into its own sword: masochism

The fact that two sexualities could exist within a single man was unacceptable in monotheism, as it would herald direct polytheism. This would mean the end of male power over women in the inbreeding culture, the end of SM-dyad, as female sexual roles would then also be honored in the conscious. 

This would mean that women could no longer be forced to inbreeding, to cousin marriages, thus eliminating the expectation of reincarnation within the family genome, with perpetual orgasm for males in their afterlife, the deepest religion of males:

Above we see a sort of mixture between 'reincarnation through inbreeding' and 'resurrection in heaven'. It's not a joke, it's the reality of what Muslim males believe.

In their conscience, they believe in Allah and heaven. That's what they've been told all their lives. That's their conscious neocortex from Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1350cc). But in their unconscious, they still believe in 'reincarnation through inbreeding' from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc). And that's their unconscious amygdala. 

Above in the blue picture it is all religious contamination from two worlds, where the amygdala is the repository of all possible previous religions in evolution, encoded in the genes. All these previous religions and gods are jumbled in the amygdala and compete with each other in a Babylonian confusion of tongues. This leads, especially in written religions, to impossible combinations of unreality, which compel magical thinking to still derive some kind of meaning from them.

The result? Muslim males don't know why they still inbreed, why their daughters are still forced to marry cousins, and they even think it's about "family honor". They really mean it sincerely. But since Homo erectus, 'reincarnation through inbreeding' was meant for perpetual orgasm in the afterlife of their own tribe, in their own DNA.

But then they would be killed as unbelievers in Islam, so they conflated perpetual orgasm from reincarnation with perpetual orgasm in heaven from resurrection. This is no joke; this is the reality of an amygdala that stores all sexual memories in animals throughout evolution, which has led to an inextricable tangle of warring "gods" in bipedal primates.

In nature, in the context of animal religion, there is stability of sexual feelings over time. If anything changes at all in those 600 million years of evolution, their amygdala evolves only slowly.

So the amygdala is our evolutionary sexual memory, in other words our physiological bible. In fact, the Bible is just as fractionated as our sexual amygdala; it's also an illogical Babylonian confusion of tongues. Could the Bible perhaps be a literal translation? Could Jewish scholars have activated their unconscious amygdala while compiling the scriptures? It's quite possible.

Mesopotamian religions refers to the Aramaic, Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian, and Assyrian religions. Could they all have entrusted their religious=sexual inheritance to clay tablets? And did the Jews, Christians, and Muslims later add to this? Is that perhaps the true meaning of the Babylonian confusion of tongues? All those different amygdalae from evolution?

All this would mean that people can revise their indoctrinated beliefs in the neocortex but not their sexual instincts in the amygdala. So, never try to change one's amygdala, that will not work, only the neocortex can be changed.

We can't change our inherited amygdala. But we can become aware of it, in which case we become morally responsible for who we truly are. This is how you can prevent your father from experiencing a reincarnation psychosis. Simply by making him aware of his reincarnation projection in the next life. Then he can fight himself instead of his daughter...

In conclusion, I think inbred populations have developed different amygdalae than outbred populations. This is sometimes due to millions of years of genetic ingraining. It stands to reason that outbred populations exhibit more "religious" (read: sexual) variation in their concept of God.

But then there are at least two subspecies of Homo sapiens, descended from the first bipedal primates. Inbred and outbred populations could exist. And now we know from their amygdalae that they can integrate, but not assimilate. And that's a very serious warning for Western Europe...

Because people are literally driven mad by their amygdalae, so much that they're slaughtering each other for deviant amygdalas. And that's what we now call freedom of religion...