SexualReligion

(401) Honor killings: cultural transfer or sexual instinct?

(400) The Sexual Model of Religion

(402) Christianity is based on a fallacy

(403) Political Correctness split between two religions

(404) Basic Models of Racism

(405) The Racism Equation

(406) Homo naledi gave us Archetypal Racism

(407) Woke Hominids spread Identity Politics

(408) Basic Models of Racism

(409) Paradigm Shift interferes with Racism

(410) The Mixed-race assimilation paradox

(411) Political gangs in racism

(412) To The American People (about racism)

(413) The Conclusive Theory of Honor Killings (Suicide)🔴🔴

(414) Magical and natural religious vectors: HR= f(SR)

(415) Conscious (hate), unconscious ('love'), Honor Killings

(416) No one warned Romina Ashrafi about Reincarnation Psychosis

(417) Between/Within variance in Sexual Models

(418) The Origin of the Myth of Paradise

(419) Woman's power over resurrection and reincarnation, but not over FGM 🔴

(420) The Archeology of Fossil Religions

(421) Don't put the father in jail for his son's honor killing

(422) Women don't commit honor killings

(423) Homo naledi: Leti proves belief in the God of Darkness

(424) Core dimensions of Human Religion

(425) Sodom and Gomorrah show the true face of Monotheism

(426) Superior and inferior religions

(427) Homo naledi was smart enough to let rebirth transcend inbreeding🔴

(428) Islam goes back on Homo naledi

(429) Human Religion (HR) from Animal Religion (AR)

(430) NUMBER ARCHIVE 2022

(431) NUMBER ARCHIVE JUNE 2023

(432) How Jewish scholars tricked the 'God of inbreeding' into Outbreeding

(433) Evolution of the Myth of Paradise

(434) Fundamental principles of this blog

(435) Introduction into bipedal primate religion

(436) Creation of Honor Killings

(437) Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

(438) Religion is a projection on Breeding

(439) Reincarnation and Resurrection

(440) Honor Killing Proneness

(441) Honor Killing in Islamic Culture

(442) NUMBER ARCHIVE JANUARI 2024

(443) NUMBER ARCHIVE OCTOBER 2024

(444) An elegant proof to the cause of Honor Killing

(445) What I would say to a smart Muslim girl

(446) What is magical religion?

(447) Big steps, home fast

(448) Evolution of the Viagra Instinct

(449) Depth Psychological Analysis to Honor Killings

(450) Animal religion and Human religion

(451) SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad

(452) The blatant lie in the European Constitution Against Discrimination

(453) Inbreeding and Outbreeding wars of bipedal primates

(454) Hast thou eaten naked of the Tree of Outbreeding?

(455) The Porn Bible replaces Islam and Christianity

(456) Gender fluidity sphere envelops the Godspace

(453) Inbreeding and Outbreeding wars of bipedal primates

A-RELIGIOUS CULTURES HAVE MAJOR PROBLEMS TO UNDERSTAND RELIGIOUS CULTURES. ALSO FOR THEM, I WROTE THE NATURAL SCIENCE DERIVATIVE OF HUMAN RELIGION FROM ANIMAL RELIGION:

RELIGION IS NOT WHAT WE THINK IT IS.

RELIGION IS A PROJECTION ON BREEDING.

Inbreeding and outbreeding are major hereditary sexual instincts from the unconscious, because they are directed on the birth process, on breeding, on procreation. That is why they fall under animal religion. They are incompatible instincts that in evolution always led to civil wars. This has been going on for 10 million years in bipedal primates.

(432) How Jewish scholars tricked the 'God of inbreeding' into Outbreeding

(433) Evolution of the Myth of Paradise

THE SECRET OF GENESIS

I always knew there was something rotten in Genesis and it took me 8 years to understand. I just couldn't put my finger on it. But now I'm there. They simple threw the 'Tree of Life of Inbreeding' out of Paradise and I agree with whole my heart. Then they dragged the 'Tree of Knowledge of Outbreeding' to the midst of Paradise. And now I see I'm on the same page. I agree completely with Jewish scholars who concocted Genesis.

(432) How Jewish scholars tricked the 'God of inbreeding' into Outbreeding

When we understand the real intentions of Jewish scholars to save the world from inbreeding, which was rather harmless for bipeds up to and including Homo erectus with its varied genome, but devastating for Homo sapiens, we are grateful for the enormous influence of ~~Abrahamic~~ religions, of Desert Religions.

Never would the 'Tree of Knowledge of Outbreeding' be placed next to the 'Tree of Life of Inbreeding' in the middle of the garden. What, of course, would be confusing and misleading nonsense. So Jewish Scholars deliberately changed the myth here.

The reality created by Jewish scholars is as follows:

1: 3500 years ago, Jewish Culture was on the way to outbreeding in which female gods were honored in the conscious of males, according to the fact that there was a matrilineal bloodline in which females (Eve) chose their males (The Serpent), who not even needed to be Jewish (outbreeding ), while mtDNA of women determined Jewish descent. Or Jewish scholars had this ideal in mind for their new society.

2. But because the prevailing culture was based on inbreeding, a connection had to be sought with the wrong paradise of God's inbreeding experiments, while the whole world would be a paradise in case of outbreeding:

3: This ideal meant that the Jewish people had to be thrown out of the inbreeding paradise.

4: Only therefore Adam was needed because actually the Serpent of that other tribe played the leading role.

5: To this end, Jewish scholars intentionally created confusion in the garden of Eden, by which only Eve thought that the 'Tree of Knowledge of Outbreeding' stood in the middle of the garden:

6: But in fact Jewish scholars, God and Adam knew that the Tree of Life was the only tree in the middle of the garden. The place of the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil is unknown till the present day 😉.

7: Because the Serpent was from another tribe he had no idea where the trees should be.

8: He thought it was nonsense and made love with Eve under the 'Tree of Life of Inbreeding' in the middle of the garden.

9: Eve got a child (The Apple) from the Serpent and told Adam that it was his.

Adam accepted The Apple as his child and was therefore complicit in Outbreeding, also because, according to the ritual intention of The Paradise Myth, he had to keep a close eye on his wife to prevent adultery. Now Adam also had eaten of the Apple of Outbreeding and was also 'naked' for God. By the way the role of Adam is not that important for the story. There are more degrees of freedom to frame the role of Adam in this plot.

10: First God became furious and cursed Adam and Eve because he understood from Adam that Eve had eaten the Apple of the Tree of Knowledge. But when it became clear that it had happened under the Tree of Life, he recognized his loss and promised Adam and Eve all the help with their outbreeding experiment.

11: In accordance with the Word of God that everything that happened under the Tree of Life would get His blessing, this also had to be applied to this act of outbreeding. Because God had made no exceptions to this.

12: Jewish Scholars had to take three things into account for their new religion:

Firstly, God was not allowed to lead a loss of face, because then he would become unusable for outbreeding, because people loved their God of Inbreeding. So it was all framed as just a mistake of an unimportant woman (Eve) from the inbreeding culture who caused the problem.

Secondly, the Jewish Bible would never talk about inbreeding, because that would deter the population, which often did not see the connection with autosomal recessive disorders and was addicted to and enchanted by inbreeding.

Thirdly, Jewish scholars of course knew about reincarnation, which had become a magical religion, an artificial sexual instinct in the unconscious of people, conditioned on inbreeding. People were fascinated by 'reincarnation through inbreeding'. And that meant that this designation had to be replaced by 'worship of idols', from ancestors as family gods waiting for reincarnation.

All this meant that in The Jewish Bible the following change was mandated: 'Reincarnation versus resurrection' became 'Worshiping Idols versus Monotheism'.

And that while Reincarnation is the greatest religious achievement of Bipedal Primates.

'Reincarnation through Inbreeding' or 'worship of idols' was the worst thing that believers could do from now on. On the other hand, the monotheistic God in heaven had to be honored. And because believers were reconstructed in the hereafter, in heaven, without birthproces and miraculous with their entire genome, inbreeding was not needed any longer.

Ezekiel 6:5

And I will lay the dead carcases of the children of Israel before their idols; and I will scatter your bones round about your altars.

Ezekiel 6:13

Then shall ye know that I am the LORD, when their slain men shall be among their idols round about their altars, upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree, and under every thick oak, the place where they did offer sweet savour to all their idols.

Ezekiel 16:36

And when he had broken down the altars and the groves, and had beaten the graven images into powder, and cut down all the idols throughout all the land of Israel, he returned to Jerusalem.

So, we can only understand the Myth of Paradise if we accept the premise that God meant only the Tree of Life (Inbreeding) to stand in the middle of the garden. Of course it would be quite stupid to think that God positioned the Tree of Knowledge (Outbreeding) next to it, because then the core of the inbreeding culture would fall out of the plot.

Yet Jewish scholars used this self created ambiguity to plead themself free of cheating. Was Eve wrong? We will never know and it does not matter because now the Jewish people could choose for Outbreeding. And we know they chose for outbreeding of the female bloodline matriarchate within a male patriarchal legal system.

Jewish scholars wanted the Tree of Knowledge of Outbreeding placed in the middle of the garden:

ADDENDUM FROM 2016, REWRITTEN IN 2024:

(122) Islam is a hybrid religion

It took me 8 years to fully understand the next sentence below. I knew that Jewish scholars were too smart to write such a grammatical crippled and syntactically ambiguous sentence:

'the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.'

Here, they did not explicitly place the Tree of Knowledge in the middle of the garden, it just seemed possible, but in the end I opted for the Tree of Life.

The 'Tree of Knowledge of Outbreeding' was only as a grammatical possibility posted in the middle of the Inbreeding Paradise. But the opposite could also be true. Just brilliant.

So with this ambiguity, Jewish Scholars could go two sides. Ultimately, the Tree of Knowledge could also have been in the middle of the garden and then Genesis would still be a correct representation of God's will.

All this prevented logical thinking from believers. They were fooled and something happened under the surface that I could not understand at that time.

(140) FGM, Inbreeding and climate change

But now, in the end, I understand and I can approve their noble striving to save desert people from the curse of their deserted desert: the curse of inbreeding by not being able to opt for outbreeding with women from other tribes:

(135) Early signs of FGM and Inbreeding

Assumption 277: The last possible origin of cousin marriages lies in the Arabian Peninsula about 50,000 years ago, where first human families (mtDNA =L3N) could not exchange fresh juvenile females with other tribes and desperately had to find new formulas to exchange females within just a few families. This measure from the time derivative of sexual culture might have become instinctive 'religion' for Muslims.

Speech parsing 'middle of the garden'

What meant the Jewish text regarding the location of the Tree of Knowledge actually in speech parsing? From the text it can not be concluded where the Tree of Knowledge was situated.

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-2/

9(Gen 2:9) And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

(Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF, en de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads

ט. וַיַּצְמַח יְהֹוָה אֱלֹהִים מִןהָאֲדָמָה כָּלעֵץ נֶחְמָד לְמַרְאֶה וְטוֹב לְמַאֲכָל וְעֵץ הַחַיִּים בְּתוֹךְ הַגָּן וְעֵץ הַדַּעַת טוֹב וָרָע:

Heere God Jehova en groeien . negende (<< leesrichting eerste regel)

en goed bij leuk bomen van grond

boom tuin van het leven boom voedsel

:kwaad goed van kennis

T.. En de HEERE God had alle geboomte groeien uit de aarde en lekker eten in (het midden van) de tuin van de Boom des Levens en de Boom van Kennis (goed kwaad):

T .. and the Lord God had all the trees grow from the earth and good food in (the middle of) the garden of the tree of life and the tree of knowledge (good evil):

(וְעֵץ הַחַיִּים בְּתוֹךְ = boom van het leven)

(וְעֵץ הַדַּעַת= boom van kennis)

(וְעֵץ = boom = כָּלעֵץ)

(הַגָּן = tuin)

(טוֹב = goed)

(וָרָע = kwaad)

( לְמַאֲכָל= voedsel)

(וְטוֹב = en goed)

(לְמַרְאֶה = bij)

( נֶחְמָד= leuk)

( מִןהָאֲדָמָה= van grond)

(אֱלֹהִים = HEERE God)

( וַיַּצְמַח= en groeien)

( יְהֹוָה = Jehova)

( ט.= negende)

(midden =עצמאמ = לבז )

(hof = ףוחה)

(בְּתוֹךְ הַגָּן = (in het midden van) de tuin)

(midden van de hof = ףוה / ןאו / הפשא תומרע)

(midden van de hof = hof / van / midden)

(centrum = זכרמה)

(grond = הָאֲדָמָה)

(van = מִן)

T.. En de HEERE God had alle geboomte groeien uit de aarde en lekker eten in de tuin van de Boom des Levens en de Boom van Kennis:

T.. And the LORD God to grow every tree from the earth and good food in the garden the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge:

T.. Et l'Éternel Dieu à croître chaque arbre de la terre et de la bonne nourriture dans le jardin de l'Arbre de Vie et l'Arbre de la Connaissance:

Vertaal van Nederlands naar Hebreeuws

Om ons argument te checken voeren wij de Nederlandse tekst in en bekijken de Hebreeuwse spelling:

To check our argument, we introduce the Dutch text and view the Hebrew spelling:

(Gen 3:3) Maar van de vruchten van de boom, die in het midden van de tuin staat, heeft God gezegd. Daar mag je niet van eten, je mag er ook niet aankomen, anders ga je dood.

(Gen 3: 3) But of the fruits of the tree that stands in the middle of the garden, God said. You can't eat from that, you can't touch it either, otherwise you die.

אבל פרי העץ אשר בתוך הגן, אמר אלהים. מכיוון שאתה לא יכול לאכול, אתה גם לא צריך להגיע, אחרת תמות.

(בתוך הגן = midden van de tuin)

(הַגָּן = tuin)

(בתוך = in)

Geconcludeerd mag worden dat ‘de tuin’ of in het ‘midden van de tuin’ op hetzelfde kan neerkomen. Daarom is het aannemelijk dat ook de Hebreeuwse tekst uitgaat van de boom des levens in het midden van de tuin. Maar…dit geldt niet dwingend voor de boom der kennis.

[It can be concluded that the 'garden' or the 'middle of the garden' can amount to the same thing. Therefore it is likely that the Hebrew text also uses the tree of life in the midst of the garden. But...this is not mandatory for the tree of knowledge.]

En dit maakt het NBG (Nederlands Bijbelgenootschap 1979) ervan:

(Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF, BENEVENS de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads.

(Gen 2: 9) and the Lord God had all the trees sprout from the soil, pleasant to the sight, and good to food; And the tree of life in the middle of the court, as well as the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

Compare:

In gangbaar Nederlands: (In common Dutch:)

(A) (Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF, en de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads.

[Staat hier soms het volgende:] (Is written here the following:)

(B) (Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens, en de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF .

... and the tree of life, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the middle of the court.

Beware: The myth of paradise is a millions of years old initiation ritual for young males in inbreeding cultures (without speech), in which they 'swore' to prevent females (Eves) from being adulterous with strange males (Serpents from other tribes (outbreeding)). Never would the 'Tree of Knowledge of Outbreeding' be placed next to the 'Tree of Life of Inbreeding' in the middle of the garden. What, of course, would be confusing and misleading nonsense. So Jewish Scholars deliberately changed the myth here.

[Of kan dit ook bedoeld zijn]

(C) (Gen 2:9) En de HEERE God had alle geboomte uit het aardrijk doen spruiten, begeerlijk voor het gezicht, en goed tot spijze; en de boom des levens IN HET MIDDEN VAN DEN HOF, en de boom der kennis des goeds en des kwaads AAN DE RAND VAN DEN HOF.

and the tree of life in the middle of the court, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil on the edge of the court.

It can be concluded that the 'garden' or the 'middle of the garden' can amount to the same thing. Therefore it is likely that the Hebrew text also uses the tree of life in the midst of the garden. But...this is not mandatory for the tree of knowledge. From the text it can not be concluded where the Tree of Knowledge was situated.

Much later:

(454) Hast thou eaten naked of the Tree of Outbreeding?

In Genesis the word 'naked' must be taken literally. First, because naked is a decisive characteristic of Outbreeding while dressed indicates cultforming like Inbreeding and secondly because a figurative meaning of 'naked' is incomprehensible in such a simple myth.

Jewish scholars knew that animal outbreeding preceded bipedal inbreeding. That's why God's first Creation Story was outbreeding:

And the second story was inbreeding:

But it was also a set up to rightly turn the Jewish faith back to outbreeding:

😏

This blog is based on corroborated circumstantial evidence on a logical basis,

made up of an ordening of intellectual reasoning from my unconscious.

😒

THIS IS HUMAN RELIGION:

SEXUAL BIPOLARITY

BIPEDAL PRIMATES

Assumption 686: In inbreeding cultures, males choose their partners and in outbreeding cultures females choose partners.

The Muslim faith is a dual religion, a hybrid religion of animal religion (reincarnation) and human religion (Islam).

It's not just inbreeding versus outbreeding, but both are the extremes of human culture. They definitely don't mix:

In the unconscious Inbreeding and Outbreeding cultures are completely incompatible. Integration can be achieved in the conscious, but assimilation only takes place in the unconscious.

Up to now the conclusion is that Inbreeding and Outbreeding cultures are diametrically opposed sexual cultures that cannot go together:

But with the ever growing human population and its volatility a new reality has to be faced based on mutual respect and theoretical knowledge about the pitfalls and threats of social disintegration towards parallel societies and eventually civil war. A human tragedy of epic proportions can only be prevented by having correct knowledge of the differences between the groups, to start with.

So with Bipedal Religion the battle always goes between Monotheism and Polytheism, between male and female or between inbreeding and outbreeding:

THIS IS ABOUT ANIMAL RELIGION:

Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.

THERE IS NO FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HUMAN

RELIGION AND ANIMAL RELIGION.

HUMAN RELIGION IS SUBLIMATED SEXUALITY:

HUMANS ARE ANIMALS IN DISGUISE:

ANIMALS ARE ETHICAL BEINGS TOO:

Sometimes even more than humans:

Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.

Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality

(456) Gender fluidity sphere envelops the Godspace

The ancient Greeks were a lot wiser than us:

Or even El Greco: Gender fluidity

INBREEDING IS A SEXUAL DISORDER:

Assumption 687: Inbreeding as a sexual disorder.

In nature, all animals developed outbreeding not to die out from autosomal recessive disorders. Only bipedal primates developed inbreeding as an innate sexual disorder in order not to die out due to lack of females from other tribes for healthy procreation. So, only for bipeds inbreeding is attached and conditioned on breeding as an artificial sexual instinct.

Throughout the evolution, bipeds waged wars where inbreeding and outbreeding are excluding sexual instincts. In our era, outbreeding cultures (Christians) try to absorb and swallow inbred populations (Muslims), while the latter obsessively kill strangers (Christians) to protect their sexual monoculture against intruders.

This opposite projection on breeding is the main cause of religious wars in bipedal evolution. Contrary sexual instincts are incompatible and can never be reconciled:

Assumption 688: The heredity of honor killings.

The inbreeding culture of bipedal primates could be about 10 million years old and that means that the previous inbreeding culture before Islam could be the last version. To this magical sexual instinct - inbreeding is not needed for procreation - a next magical sexual instinct could have been added by Homo erectus: reincarnation. So that the previous inbred population before Islam had a combined sexual instinct of 'reincarnation through inbreeding'. But this magical sexual instinct conditioned on procreation did not disappear after the onset of Islam. Therefore, when Muslim women are obliged to marry a Muslim there is a big chance that the risk on honor killing based on 'reincarnation through inbreeding' is passed on hereditarily.

(76) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 4: 400-700)

Assumption 519: The Feast of Sacrifice is the Feast of Reincarnation.
Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) invented the soul and reincarnation. Millions of years later, Homo sapiens (350 Ka; 1450cc) invented the parallel universe. Of course, a conflict of interest has arisen. For, during the period of Homo erectus, males had become egotheistic gods with absolute self-determination to reincarnate into their own tribe. They never wanted to live with the gods in the afterlife.
That's why the myth of Abraham created the compromise in which God was worshipped in the parallel universe and humans were allowed to reincarnate on earth. So far, so good.
But Homo erectus had a much more diverse genome and was much more tolerant of inbreeding than Homo sapiens, who dropped to 3,000-10,000 breeding pairs with a very reduced genome, 100-50,000 years ago.
That is why Desert Religions changed the rules about 4,000 years ago and ex cathedra forced believers to resurrection in heaven to make inbreeding unnecessary for reincarnation. But at the same time males lost their divine egotheistic power. So, Muslim males lost divine power 1400 years ago to monotheistic terror which took all power to itself.
To establish their terror, Desert Religions changed the Myth of Abraham. It would be about polytheism (ancestors, idols) and monotheism (God). But the original myth takes on a more important role in reincarnation and resurrection. Because only then is Abraham's proposed murder on Isaac understandable.
So, what kind of situation has been created by Islam? Muslim males believe in Allah today, just as Abraham (a mythological figure) believed in God. But in nowadays Islam, people take it for granted that belief in Allah at the same times means the acceptance of resurrection in heaven. And that is the flaw in the Islamic faith. And here it goes wrong, because just like Abraham, Muslim males instinctively continued to believe in earthly reincarnation. And that is why they cherish the Feast of Sacrifice so exuberantly.

HONOR KILLINGS EXPLAINED TO MUSLIM GIRLS

List of 73 Honor Killing articles:

(5) Honor killings caused by inbreeding and incest
(7) Honor killings in Islamic culture
(8) Honor killing Scenarios
(15) A new approach to Honor killings
(15) Een nieuwe benadering van Eerwraak
(25) Honor killings in short

(38) Killing Honor
(39) Killing Honor by fading Perpetual Orgasm

(128) The Honor Syndrome
(129) The domain of honor killing proneness
(130) The tragedy of Mirjam Abarkan 🔴
(131) What Muslim girls should know 🔴
(132) Wat moslimmeisjes moeten weten

(138) The Land of Myrrh (FGM) (Efua Dorkenoo)

(147) The Muslim instinct (Sadia Sheikh)

(160) Breakthrough in honor killings 🔴⚠️
(161) Grandpa, please come into my womb
(162) Muslim 'honor' signifies fertility stress
(163) The Muslim fertility obsession

(230) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial 🔴
(231) 'Honor of the family' is an outright lie

(270) Honor killings

(305) The cause of honor killings🔴🔴

(312) Honor Killing Standard (Romina Ashrafi)

(319) The Truth about honor killings (Romina Ashrafi)

(330) Honor Killing Standard Theory

(334) Honor killings are Reincarnation killings

(335) Reincarnation psychosis

(336) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial

(342) The Truth about Honor Killings
(346) Eerwraak (Honor Revenge) is a contradictio in terminis
(349) Paradigm shift explains Honor Killings
(350) The Truth about Honor Killings
(351) New Foundations Human Religion
(352) Bizarre and twisted love is the sick cause of honor killings

(363) Honor killings are the organizing principle of Islam

(368) Masochism hate: Rosetta stone to Islam (Tahrir Square)

(374) Two main laws of Human Religion

(375) Timeline of Honor Killings

(377) How Honor Killing works

(378) Why have not Muslims solved honor killings themselves?

(379) Breakthrough in Honor Killings

(401) Honor killings: cultural transfer or sexual instinct?

(413) The Conclusive Theory of Honor Killings (Suicide)🔴🔴

(414) Magical and natural religious vectors: HR= f(SR)

(415) Conscious (hate), unconscious ('love'), Honor Killings

(416) No one warned Romina Ashrafi about Reincarnation Psychosis

(421) Don't put the father in jail for his son's honor killing

(422) Women don't commit honor killings

(436) Creation of Honor Killings

(437) Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

(438) Religion is a projection on Breeding

(439) Reincarnation and Resurrection

(440) Honor Killing Proneness

(441) Honor Killing in Islamic Culture

(444) An elegant proof to the cause of Honor Killing

(445) What I would say to a smart Muslim girl

(446) What is magical religion?

(447) Big steps, home fast

(449) Depth Psychological Analysis to Honor Killings

Honor killings by fathers or brothers have a different origin:

Sadia Sheikh, Gülsüm Selim and Ryan Al Najjar should not have trusted their brothers:

(The Paradise Myth is an initiation ritual - without speech - from the animal world in which young males are instructed to prevent females (Eve) to have sex with males (Serpent) from other tribes.)

If this blog was known in the Netherlands, it would have saved the lives of Ryan Al Najjar in 2024 and Mirjam Abarkan in 2013:

(130) The tragedy of Mirjam Abarkan 🔴

Dutch parliament, take responsibility, because honor killings happen under your watch:

STRATEGY AGAINST HONOR KILLING:

1: Keep legal liability to honor killing.

2: But, postpone moral liability until the official declaration of the unconscious as main cause of honor killing. Without the unconscious there is no solution for honor killings.

3: Prevent fatal estimation errors by informing Muslim girls correctly about the nature of honor killing.

(450) Animal religion and Human religion

What is animal religion?

What is human religion?

What is outbreeding?

What is inbreeding?

So, religion is a projection on breeding:

Remarkably enough, this blog ends in 2024 exactly as it began in 2010: Religion is a projection on breeding:

(9) The Convergence Theory of Paradise

The Muslim faith is a dual religion, a hybrid religion of animal religion (reincarnation) and human religion (Islam).

Resurrection of Islam can never beat reincarnation of its previous inbreeding culture, because resurrection is a powerless word that must be indoctrinated until the end of time:

This is bipedal primate evolution of religious concepts:

Our investigation arrived at the following conclusion about honor killing:

Honor killing is the curse of religious contamination between

reincarnation and resurrection in inbreeding cultures:

And this is the State of Nature of honor killing:

'So, if religion is defined as a sexual instinct focused on reproduction, breeding or propagation, then testosterone is the religious impetus for males, which decreases due to aging. Subsequently, lack of testosterone is replaced by sexual fantasies.
In evolution bipedal primates postulated the soul and the hereafter through reincarnation. This process took place with Homo erectus, the first real human.
Reincarnation is a sexual fantasy, as is 'perpetual orgasm' from a never ending sexual drive. This made perpetual orgasm the holy grail of male religion. Perpetual orgasm is the real purpose of male religion.
Because of Islam, reincarnation became an oppressed fantasy in the unconscious of Muslim males. The same applies to perpetual orgasm, which was made obsolete by Desert Religions because the afterlife was defined as a-sexual.
But when a sexual instinct as reincarnation is suppressed into an unconscious sexual fantasy, a reincarnation psychosis can arise when daughters refuse to meet their father's religious (read: sexual) wishes, such as to marry their cousins. This can result in honor killing.'

And this is the religious evolution of bipedal primates:

And this is the Powertrend of Bipedal Primates:

These are the implications of this blog:

Explanation:

'DID for all males':

- Muslim male relatives with severe mood swings

or long-term depression are a risk factor, unlike moderate,

stable characters with a cheerful disposition.

Split personalities or multiple personalities, especially

with unknown and therefore unconscious Alters (DID),

are an important risk factor.

'Inbreeding coefficient':

- The inbreeding coefficient relates to the severity and

duration of inbreeding over generations, because

harmful effects can be amplified over time.

Moral responsibility:

- The conclusion reached in this blog is that honor killers

should certainly be held responsible for their actions in

a legal sense, but this is questionable in a moral

sense.

(437) Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

(154) Coefficient of Inbreeding (C.O.I.)
(156) Coefficient of Relationship (C.O.R.)

(451) SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad

And this is the Powertrend of Bipedal Primates:

These are the implications of this blog:

SM-DYAD IS ONE OF THE GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS OF BIPEDAL PRIMATES IN THE RELIGIOUS FIELD:

SM-DYAD PROMOTES SEXUAL LUST AND LEADS TO MORE OFFSPRING:

Animals cannot control SM-dyad, which directly results in rape and murder. But bipedal primates can in principle control SM-dyad. But SM-dyad (strong) falls apart in rape and murder earlier than SM-dyad (weak) while it never happens with Vanilla-dyad:

Civil war in Western Europe:

FULL SEXUALRELIGION MODEL HOMO SAPIENS:

SM-DYAD:

Chimpanzees are not very interested in sexuality and have little offspring. In case of danger they flee into the trees.

But bipedal primates had to learn to defend against felines in open savannas, standing close together with long wooden spears and roaring loudly. They were as strong as chimpanzees.

But anyway, bipeds had too few offspring to survive and increased production by fantasizing sadomasochism during sexual play. It became the icing on the cake:

Bipedal primates also invented SM-dyad to control females that dislike inbreeding.

For bipedal primates SM-dyad is much stronger than Vanilla-dyad, which is more a cultural entity than a sexual instinct.

But for animals Vanilla-dyad could be a sexual instinct, perhaps their most important underlying relationship:

In conclusion, SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad could be the extremes of an underlying sexual relationship dimension for bipedal primates, in which Vanilla-dyad is the weakest pole:

Animals cannot control SM-dyad: Chimpanzees know some inbreeding from the male bloodline, but cannot control SM-dyad (patriarchy).

Bonobos don't know inbreeding nor SM-dyad (matriarchy).

(452) The blatant lie in the European Constitution Against Discrimination

This is the Powertrend of Bipedal Primates:

These are the implications of this blog:

And this is the future of Western Europe:

Sadistic and masochistic religions were fairly separate in evolution. They attracted each other, but could not easily mix geographically. But in modern times everything is possible. The Christian masochistic lust for sadism came in need in the sixties of last century after Western Europe declared God dead, by which sadomasochistic tension fell away. Therefore, it is Christianity itself that sucked sadistic Islam into Western Europe:

In Eastern European Christian countries (authoritarian Orthodox Christianity) where God was not declared dead, no Muslim invasion took place. Not even after the collapse of communism (November 1989):

All this means that Christianity of Western Europe, without its former overarching conservative morality, quickly degenerated into absolute moral freedom of multiculturalism - which also exactly distinguishes polytheism from monotheism - so that Western Europe embraces all kinds of people, regardless of norms and values.

Why did Western European Christians not import hard working and cheap Asians who were very poor at that time? Very intelligent and attractive people with inner civilization that would come with millions, but unfortunately they were masochistic Buddhists ...

So forget about the usual argument of: "Smart business people brought Muslims into Europe, thinking they were the right employees for simple jobs." Nonsense, Muslims came to Europe for not economical reasons, they were sucked in through a religious crisis of Christianity.

And these Berbers from Morocco met the Christian needs perfectly and were not the Arabic speaking elite from Rabat:

Proud Berber survives in difficult circumstances

Depillarization or deconfessionalization in the sixties of last century:

Polytheistic cultures are masochistic and monotheistic cultures are sadistic. After the death of their God, masochistic Christianity became a single point in space and desperately needed sadistic Islam as a second point for the straight line to its pressing needs. This way, wandering Christianity found a new ruler in Islam:

(33) Chrislam, God of Policor

'And that's why multiculturalism unwittingly turned into the masochistic squirm with ass up towards a gruesome and sadistic Islamic ruler. This sadistic tyrant was absolutely needed to let our masochistic culture retrieve its counterweight. This is because two points are needed to draw a straight line.'

In this situation, 'Omvolking' meant the unconscious Christian urge to exchange Sado-Masochistic lusts with Islam to achieve a new and sexually satisfactory balance. And (former) Christians, who are now politically correct, in influential positions of society rationalized their unknown sexual desires within corresponding socially acceptable boundaries. And so the wrong impression came to the fore from a mysterious elite who, according to plan, worked to refresh the European population. But there has been no organized conspiracy, no organized replacement migration, no hidden planned Umvolkung:

But if there has been no organized conspiracy, no organized replacement migration, no hidden planned umvolkung, then there must be a greatest common denominator in the European population that explains all variance of the phenomenon.

Where conscious reasons for omvolking comes from all directions, there must be found a single unconscious factor that explains all conscious rationalisations. So, this Multifactor Constellation has to be replaced by a super strong unconscious instinct, that explains all behavioral variety of a hundred million Europeans. What would that biggest common divisor be?

For that we look at the differences with the Muslim faith. The latter is originally and fundamentally based on inbreeding, while European peoples have long switched to outbreeding. For example, in the Netherlands, a man can get married with a Chinese woman and nobody is interested in her religion. That would be a big problem in Islam.

The European Outbreeding Culture is based on polytheism, where also female Gods (e.g. Mary) are worshiped in the conscious, so that Europeans also worship masochism in their conscious. This will not be heard in sadistic monotheism of Islam, where women are absolutely not worshiped, only tolerated if they follow male domination.

This all means sado masochism must be the real cause of omvolking:

The European Constitution Against Discrimination

Millions and Millions of Christians in Europe unconsciously worshiped Islam with their new Constitution against Discrimination.They had no idea of doing something wrong with protecting groups and individuals against discrimination, REGARDLESS OF THEIR IDEAS. And so it happened that Islam as the most discriminatory religion got full legal freedom for discrimination under the flag of the European Constitution.

This European Constitution Against Discrimination brought Christianity on its knees and meant its masochistic surrender to Islam:

(33) Chrislam, God of Policor

Sadomasochistic attraction is the unconscious sexual instinct that underlies

omvolking. But because this phenomenon is misunderstood, countless rationalisations have arisen. For multiculturalism, anti-racism was suggested as a motivation for omvolking. And the EU, which committed an undemocratic power grab on Europe, would undermine the specific white identities of the various States and dilute them with the import of other peoples. Numerous rationalisations were developed, all sincere, but insufficient explanations for the phenomenon.

(294) Omvolking is a sadomasochistic entanglement (Replacement migration (UN))
(295) Omvolking is the battle between subspecies of Homo sapiens

'But since there are already too many people and the subspecies live closely intermingled together, both cannot be separated in a natural way anymore. We conclude to the diagram below: SM-dyad (weak) is healthy and natural for bipedal primates, but Vanilla-dyad is an unsustainable cultural intervention leading to the collapse of sadism and masochism into sadomasochism (Chrislam) and civil war:'

'And therefore, the separation of Homo sapiens into two subspecies will lead to yet another civil war. Omvolking results in civil war:'

Civil war in Western Europe:

Sado-masochism is the basic characteristic of bipedal primates.

Science is in the happy circumstance that sadism (monotheism or male heterosexality)

and masochism (polytheism or 'all sexual roles') can be understood rather well by studying Islam and Christianity.

Through Artificial Intelligence (AI), science will try to formulate decision rules through which these religions will converge into their final clash. The basic for this was laid - among other things - by approximately 700 assumptions of this blog.

In fact, Christianity and Islam are more than symbolic for today's world powers by their huge numbers of believers. That is why lessons can be drawn from the upcoming confrontation between these sexual polarities that will apply to all humanity to the furthest stars.

Brilliant scientists may be able to formulate correct decision rules to contain the course of this collision. Perhaps civil wars can be prevented, but moreover these decision rules can be used to prevent follow-up conflicts between sadism and sexual neutral cultures.

Sadism should never terrorize the whole world after masochistic Christianity that will die in lust. Suffering is lust in masochism. But such tactical information will not be released directly to the public. We conclude that the world is not controlled by 'religion' but through sexuality.

Being a Christian is to feel like a woman.

The European Declaration of Masochistic Surrender to Islam

History will make a harsh judgment about this Orwellian doublethink, in which a Constitution against wrong IDEAS (discrimination), is discriminating by itself, because it is not aimed at ideas, but at PEOPLE AND INSTITUTIONS instead of THEIR IDEOLOGIES AND DEFECTIVE IDEAS.

(449) Depth Psychological Analysis to Honor Killings

The honor killing of Sadia Sheikh (2007)

In 2007, Mudusar Sheik, Sadia Sheikh's 27-year-old brother, shot his sister three bullets in the abdomen, killing her after three days of terrible suffering. It was premeditated that's for sure, but why didn't he just shoot her in the head? No doubt he wanted to punish her, to teach her a lesson. But it is also possible that his intention was not to kill her in the first place, but to prevent her from reproducing with her unbelieving lover (adultery) in the future, so that males of their family would not have to reincarnate into hybrid offspring. The question is to what extent he consciously thought about the latter. It is therefore important to further analyze the way in which honor killings are carried out. In this case I would say: Hate, reincarnation killing without love conflict

(413) The Conclusive Theory of Honor Killings (Suicide)🔴🔴

https://www.113.nl › i › zelfmoord. Bel 112 of 113.

https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/ Call 1-800-273-8255 (USA).

TRIBAL SEPARATION ANXIETY DISORDER

WITH PERPETUAL ORGASM (VIAGRA INSTINCT)

HONOR KILLING IS A STRUGGLE ON LIFE AND DEATH

HONOR KILLERS EVADE THEIR EXPECTED

SUICIDE AFTER REINCARNATION BY KILLING

THEIR DAUGHTERS EARLIER (DISPLACEMENT)

HONOR KILLING IS A STRUGGLE ON LIFE AND DEATH

HONOR KILLERS EVADE THEIR EXPECTED

SUICIDE AFTER REINCARNATION BY KILLING

THEIR DAUGHTERS EARLIER (DISPLACEMENT)

ADDENDUM

(444) An elegant proof to the cause of Honor Killing

An Elegant Proof to the Cause of Honor Killing

This blog solves honor killings and human religion at the same time, because the first is caused by misunderstanding the second. Honor killings are collateral damage from two incompatible religions: Reincarnation is tied to breeding which is Animal Religion (AR) and Resurrection is not tied to breeding and is Human Religion (HR).
Both cannot coexist peacefully in the minds of Muslim fathers.

We do not need to prove that Reincarnation is tied to breeding, because Reincarnation into another body cannot exist without birth process. But the opposite is also true: Reincarnation is not really needed for breeding. Therefore it took several millions
of years to Homo erectus to attach Reincarnation hereditarily and magically to breeding.

Magical religion is not actually necessary for reproduction, but has become a sexual instinct because females have considered it functional for breeding for millions of years. Magical religions without any real function for procreation are numerous in nature. Hear all stupid birds singing for nothing during the mating season:

Magical religion means that also Reincarnation is not really necessary for the birth process, but is linked artificially to reproduction by males (male bloodline), leading females to believe cousin marriages are a sexually necessary cue to procreation. This led to the second creation story:

'Daughters therefore had to reinforce XY-DNA of the male lineage with their female XX-DNA XX-DNA (cousin marriages), which incidentally also came from Adam's rib and so also from the male bloodline.'

On the other hand, Homo sapiens deliberately constructed Resurrection by definition without birth process. Not realizing that it thereby lost the link with Animal Religion (AR=SR=SexualReligion). Resurrection is therefore not a Sexual Instinct (SI),
but only a powerless word that will never be able to eradicate Reincarnation.

That's the proof to the cause of Honor Killing.

(445) What I would say to a smart Muslim girl

What I would say to a smart Muslim girl:

- If you don't believe in fairy tales, why believe in God?

- More than 90% of our thoughts disappear uncontrollably into the unconscious.

- The unconscious also contains irresistible and forbidden sexual drives.

- We suppress culturally and morally unacceptable sexual thoughts in 'the Jungian shadow' of the unconscious.

- Consider, for example, the inherited sexual mess from the first bipedal primates like pedophilia and perpetual orgasm.

- Sexual drives, or sexual instincts come from animal religion.

- Animal religion = the set of all sexual drives and sexual instincts.

- Animal religion can also be called 'sexual religion'.

- That's why this blog is called SexualReligion.

- Animal sexuality resembles an automatic physiological response, the Pavlovian reflex: the drooling dog seduced with a piece of meat.

- Human sexuality tries to cultivate this animal sexuality and calls it human religion.

- But essentially human religion remains the same Pavlovian vomiting response.

- Animal religion is a function of breeding, of procreation, of reproduction.

- Human religion is, in principle, also a function of breeding:

- So, religion is an animal sexual drive as function of procreation (breeding):

- In Islam, reincarnation is an irresistible but forbidden sexual drive, a sexual instinct.

- Reincarnation was invented by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), two million years ago.

- Islam represses reincarnation for already 1400 years under penalty of death.

- Therefore, in Islam, 'reincarnation through inbreeding' is buried in the unconscious of males.

- Religion is a projection on breeding, the birth process, it is a sexual instinct.

- Reincarnation is a magical projection on breeding, because it is not really needed for birthing.

- Reincarnation became a sexual instinct only after 2 million years of conditioning on breeding.

- But resurrection explicitly has nothing to do with the birth process.

- Therefore, resurrection is no animal religion.

Reincarnation is at least connected to reality, to a sexual instinct. But resurrection uproots women from the real world. And that is also the power of human religion, it is a Rorschach inkblot test at its best. It uproots women from reality, they become afraid and start to believe in something indefinable, they start to believe in God, in the bed spread out for their husbands in SM-dyad. Human religion is worse than magical religion. It's worse than cheating, it's pure immorality.

- So, resurrection is real human religion, but with this, scholars created a dangerous conflict situation:

- THEY CREATED TWO RELIGIONS IN THE SAME INDIVIDUAL.

- THEY CREATED REINCARNATION ON EARTH AND RESURRECTION IN HEAVEN, COMPLETELY INCOMPATIBLE, ESPECIALLY IN INBREEDING CULTURES.

- AND SO THEY SYSTEMATICALLY CREATED DISSOCIATIVE IDENTITY DISORDER (DID) IN MUSLIM MALES.

- ISLAM CREATED A DSM-V DISORDER DURING 1400 YEARS IN THE MUSLIM POPULATION:

The first DID criterium is:

1. Two or more DISTINCT IDENTITIES OR PERSONALITY STATES are present, each with its own relatively enduring pattern of perceiving, relating to and thinking about the environment and self:

The second dissociative identity disorder criterion in the DSM-5 is:

2. Amnesia must occur, defined as gaps in the recall of everyday events, important personal information and/or traumatic events.

3. The person must be distressed by the disorder or have trouble functioning in one or more major life areas because of the disorder. This criterion is common among all serious mental illness diagnoses as a diagnosis is not appropriate where the symptoms do not create distress and/or trouble functioning.

4. The disturbance is not part of normal cultural or religious practices. This DID criterion is to eliminate diagnosis in cultures or situations where multiplicity is appropriate. An example of this is in children where an imaginary friend is not necessarily indicative of mental illness.DID is systemically created by Islam.

5. The symptoms are not due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (such as blackouts or chaotic behavior during alcohol intoxication) or a ~~general medical condition~~ (such as complex partial seizures). This characteristic of dissociative identity disorder is important as substance abuse ~~or another medical condition~~ is more appropriate to diagnose, when present, than DID.

- Desert Religions created psychotic fake religion (resurrection) in their conscious and suppressed animalistic sexual religion (reincarnation) in their unconscious.

- Resurrection is just an empty shell that will never become a sexual instinct.

- And it is with 'resurrection' that Desert Religions made their fatal mistake.

- RESURRECTION IS NO ANIMAL RELIGION, NO SEXUAL DRIVE.

- Resurrection is bogus religion, a meaningless product of human psychotic imagination:

- This is the fallacy of “~~Abrahamic~~ religions”, the fundamental flaw in their faith.

- Desert Religions tried to block 'reincarnation through inbreeding', which caused autosomal recessive disorders, that's okay.

- But of course they also secretly wanted to become God's deputy on earth and take over the sacred power of tribal leaders, who determined their own afterlife through reincarnation (idols):

- Therefore they chose for resurrection in heaven instead of earthly reincarnation.

- But in doing so they belied the Myth of Abraham:

The “~~Abrahamic~~ religions” secretly reversed the Myth of Abraham:

The real myth was God's 'Solomon's judgement' between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens in which God accepted both reincarnation and resurrection:

- Desert Religions falsely changed reincarnation into polytheism (idols) and resurrection into monotheism (one God in heaven).

- Jewish scholars vehemently avoided writing about 'reincarnation', while reincarnation is human's greatest religious insight, and wrote only about 'idols' in the Bible. Did they know that reincarnation is a sexual instinct, real religion, and resurrection just a powerless word? Did they know that it was impossible to fade out sexual instincts?

- Or did Desert Religions really not understand the pitfall of 'losing the link with animal religion, without birth process'?

- Then Desert Religions must have thought reincarnation (sexual instinct)

and resurrection (a silly word) were interchangeable.

- But sexual religion (reincarnation) implies breeding, ancestors and descendants.

- So where does Islam force Muslim males to suppress their sexual instinct?

- In their unconscious.

- And in this way Islam created honor killings with many millions of victims in 1400 years:

Islam causes honor killings:

- Honor killings are caused by two conflicting religions in the minds of perpetrators. The first is reincarnation from animal religion. The second is resurrection from human religion.

- It is not clear what benefit Islam could gain from honor killings other than to exert a reign of terror over women. But they can be blamed for persecuting and exterminating reincarnation believers:

- This two-track policy of reincarnation in the unconscious and resurrection in the conscious led to numerous absurd and incomprehensible decisions of magical reasoning, so characteristic of the Muslim faith and Sharia.

- That is why the Muslim faith has become a hybrid religion based on magical thinking:

- Northern European peoples were polytheistic and empathetically recognized female sexual roles as goddesses. They also had very diluted inbreeding left.

- Both, monotheistic peoples as Islam, who humiliate women in SM-dyad and polytheistic peoples like Christians, who worship women in Vanilla-dyad, embraced resurrection. But only few Christians really believed in resurrection, so that to this day they still believe in some kind of reincarnation.

- Desert religions are growing rapidly, but will eventually lose any overarching ethical morals and group identity. Because with their creation of resurrection they lost animal religion.
- You sometimes might feel your own DID in your subconscious. If you have the vague feeling that something is rotten in Catholicism because with resurrection you smell pedophilia and homosexuality at the same time, then your subconscious warns you of deception:

- Whenever human religion denies animal religion, a schizophrenic situation arises in which believers rightly feel that sexuality is sublimated into esoteric nonsense.

- Fake religion in the conscious tries to spread sand in your eyes, human religion tries to disguise sexuality.
- HUMAN RELIGION TRIES TO DISGUISE SEXUALITY.
- In Islam, resurrection in 'heaven of Allah' became the obligatory belief in the conscious. But people didn't feel sexually involved.

- Because, as said before, resurrection has nothing to do with the birth process.

- Therefore Muslim males don't really believe in going to heaven.

- But they might believe in Allah, who lives in a parallel reality.

- Just like ancient West African Voodoo believed in God.

- But Islam has no use for Muslims who believe in Allah but not in heaven.

- Because it is precisely the final judgment of God that is the power of Islam.

- Anyhow, Islam must indoctrinate 'resurrection' until the end of time to control the sexual instinct of reincarnation.

- Because a silly word can never erase a sexual instinct from the unconscious.

- And, as said, reincarnation is a sexual instinct for already 2 million years.

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE:

- When your father is awake, he thinks of resurrection in Allah's heaven.

- But when he sleeps he thinks about reincarnation in your descendants.

- Therefore you must marry your cousin to make him reincarnate into his own family DNA.

- And if you refuse you will plunge him into a reincarnation psychosis.

AND REINCARNATION PSYCHOSIS MEANS:

- If he sleeps he wants to kill you 'out of love'.

- And if he's awake, he might rape you first:

One cannot appreciate human religion without first controlling for animal religion.

This blog attempts to develop human religion from animal religion,

initiating the gradual transition to human religion from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc), although Homo naledi (2.3 Mya-236 Ka; 550cc) from Australopithecus had a more fundamental religion without the soul:

But to refer to animal 'religion' at all would immediately be ridiculing human religion, because - as an example - the existence of God cannot be made plausible on the basis of the Alpha male in animal religion.

On the other hand, the existence of God is not really what human religion is all about. On this blog animal religion is defined as sexuality based on reproduction, on breeding, upon which human religion as a moral and philosophical construct was later built.

But it is all fake morality (e.g. 'honor' of the family) in which human males sneaky try to coerce female sexual behavior through religious deception, while in the animal world males and females naturally engage in sexual intercourse through mutual agreement and coordination.

Human male religion deceives women and thereby invokes a male, heterosexual, monotheistic God to coerce women into mating, while men themselves lack the power of persuasion.

In this way, humanity has deceptively changed the rules of animal religion from sexuality projected on breeding to a false morality attached to reproduction, causing successive religions to move further and further away from their origins of animal reproduction:

But anyways, human religions are still based on breeding:

And so the world most important religions are still based on breeding:

are still based on breeding:

(446) What is magical religion?

What is Magical Religion?

Sexual Religion is Sexuality projected on Breeding. It includes all that is necessary and functional for the act of procreation, but no more than that. But beyond that, in nature, male animals have invented all kinds of irrelevant and fake sexual cues, things to entice females to mate. In fact, they deceive females with this.

For example peafowl. Peacocks are large, colorful male pheasants (typically blue and green) known for their iridescent tails. Peahens mistakenly think these train of feathers is functional for breeding and allow themselves to be impregnated by these liars:

What happened over millions of years is that females accepted this array of feathers as functional sexual tools for mating. But we call these false assets for mating 'magical' religion to distinguish them from natural religion, such as the physical strength of males to protect females during breeding.

Magical religion is not actually necessary for reproduction, but has become a sexual instinct because females have considered it functional for breeding for millions of years.

Magical religions without any real function for procreation are numerous in nature. Hear all stupid birds singing for nothing during the mating season.

Human males have also invented many magical religions. The spoken and written word in religious scriptures is reminiscent of the power of a non-existent God, whose persuasive power foolish males themselves do not possess. And human females? They believe this nonsense and let themselves be taken by inferior males.

The deceptions for women are many. Take for example reincarnation invented by Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) along with the non-existent soul. It was all believed by women. They truly believed that women in cousin marriages had to donate their bodies to the survival of the male bloodline, for males who wanted to reincarnate into their own family genome, from inbreeding cultures. This was standing practice before Islam was introduced, otherwise they would be honor killed:

The point to make is that 'reincarnation' is not necessary for breeding, but became a magical sexual instinct attached and conditioned on breeding, which enforced females to inbreeding for reincarnation of males before Islam. And although nowadays reincarnation is repressed by Islam on pain of death, reincarnation remains an inherited magical deception, a magical sexual instinct in the DNA of the Muslim population for already two million years.

On the other hand, 'resurrection' explicitly has nothing to do with reproduction and so never became a magical religion. Resurrection remained a meaningless word, the reason why Islam had to indoctrinate its teachings for already 1400 years, because there is no other way to combat superstrong unconscious and repressed reincarnation among Muslims by a simple word.

So, in nature males deceive females to seduce them to sexual intercourse. That's animal religion. And as soon as they could talk they came up with slogans like 'honor of the family', meaning 'honor of the Muslim male' or 'honor of the male bloodline'. And when those slogans were written in a book, females believed it all:

(447) Big steps, home fast

BIG STEPS, HOME FAST:😉

CONDITIONS FOR THE SOLUTION

OF HONOR KILLINGS:

FIRST:

HONOR KILLINGS ARE COLLATERAL DAMAGE OF TWO

KINDS OF RELIGION IN THE BRAIN OF MUSLIM MALES:

REINCARNATION AND RESURRECTION. (Art. 439)

- When your father is awake, he thinks of resurrection in Allah's heaven.

- But when he sleeps he thinks about reincarnation in your descendants.

FURTHER:

1: HONOR KILLINGS CAN ONLY BE SOLVED IF

HUMAN RELIGIONS ARE IN ORIGIN

FUNCTIONS OF BREEDING. (Art.438)

2: HONOR KILLINGS CAN ONLY BE SOLVED IF

REINCARNATION IS A SEXUAL INSTINCT AND

RESURRECTION IS NOT. (Art.438)

3: HONOR KILLINGS CAN ONLY BE SOLVED IF

REINCARNATION IS SUPPRESSED IN THE

UNCONSCIOUS AND RESURRECTION IS NOT. (Art.438)

THEN:

THE MUSLIM FAITH MEETS THESE CRITERIA,

MEANING HONOR KILLING IS A METAPHOR

OF ISLAMIC FAITH, BASED ON REINCARNATION

AND RESURRECTION.

UNDERSTANDING HONOR KILLING MEANS

UNDERSTANDING ISLAM AS A MONOTHEISTIC

RELIGION, WHILE CHRISTIANITY AND JUDAISM

ARE POLYTHEISTIC WITH TRUE EMPATHY FOR

FEMALE SEXUAL ROLES, FEMALE SEXUAL GODS

IN THE CONSCIOUS.

ACCORDING TO THE IDEOLOGY OF DESERT RELIGIONS,

ISLAM TRIES TO BE POLYTHEISTIC (OUTBREEDING)

IN HEAVEN, BUT ON EARTH IT IS STILL MONOTHEISTIC

(INBREEDING) AND OFFERS ONLY MALE

HETEROSEXUALITY:

END BIG STEPS, HOME FAST

THE TRUE MYTH OF ABRAHAM:

(SOLOMON'S JUDGMENT)

GOD ACCEPTS EARTHLY REINCARNATION IF

BELIEVERS (ABRAHAM) WORSHIP THE ONLY

GOD IN HEAVEN, UPON WHICH NO HEAVENLY

RESURRECTION IS REQUIRED.

(KIND OF ANCIENT VOODOO)

ISLAMIC MAGICAL THINKING IS BASED ON

INCOMPATIBLE WAYS OF REASONING.

THE UNCONSCIOUS (REINCARNATION)

AND THE CONSCIOUS (RESURRECTION)

CANNOT GO TOGETHER IN RATIONAL THINKING.

MAGICAL THINKING NEEDS THE ENLIGHTENMENT TO BECOME RATIONAL, BECAUSE THERE ARE NUMEROUS

WAYS FOR MISUNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

THE CONSCIOUS AND THE UNCONSCIOUS.

MUSLIM CULTURE MISSED ROMANTICISM (UNCONSCIOUS):

How human religion developed

from animal religion:

EVOLUTION OF HONOR KILLINGS:

THE CHIMPANZEE BLOODLINE INSTINCT

HONOR KILLINGS COME FROM CHIMPANZEES:

KILLING MALES (CHIMPS), KILLING FEMALES (MUSLIMS)

CHIMPANZEES AND MONOTHEISM (MALE HETEROSEXUALITY)

BOTH DEFEND THE MALE KIN BONDED LINEAGE, OR MALE BLOODLINE.

THAT'S WHY EVE WAS TAKEN FROM A RIB OF ADAM (MALE DNA).

THROUGH COUSIN MARRIAGES, THIS MALE BLOODLINE WILL BE GUARANTEED OVER TIME. THEREFORE, ISLAM IS MONOTHEISTIC, WHILE JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY ARE POLYTHEISTIC.

(3) The Tragedy of God

Basic Dimension

(438) Religion is a projection on Breeding

Number Archive

What is Human Religion:

Assumption 680: Human Religion.

1: Human religion is the rationalization of the male sexual drive in the unconscious.

2. Male sexual drives serve to force women into sexual intercourse.

3: In nature, sexual drives are functions of breeding.

4: Then, human religions are rationalized functions of breeding.

5: So, human religions are deceptive functions of breeding, serving to coerce women into sexual intercourse with sacred and murderous pressure.

6: Males modify female sexual behavior in such a way that benefits them (FGM, cousin marriages, pedophilia, SM-dyad, Vanilla-dyad, etc).

Only Breeding is mentioned as Sexual Religion (SR) because it is the primal sexual instinct in the animal world. But actually Breeding is already combined in the unconscious with a lot of attached and conditioned specific instincts as Rebirth and Reincarnation:

Resurrection is just a powerless word and no sexual instinct:

Assumption 682: The cause of honor killings.

In nature, sexual instincts are among the strongest instincts, meant for the preservation of species. They are based on outbreeding.

But bipedal primates (e.g. humans) have developed an artificial sexual instinct through inbreeding, which in nature would lead to extinction.

Therefore Desert Religions developed resurrection to counter reincarnation through inbreeding.

Subsequently, Islam replaced reincarnation with resurrection, but reincarnation is a strong sexual instinct because it is linked to the birth process, while resurrection is a just a word and expressly not linked to breeding.

Reincarnation was then pushed into the unconscious where it still lives on among the Muslim population.

The Muslim population is therefore still based on sexual instincts in the following order: as a function of reincarnation, inbreeding and reproduction: Mp = f(Reinc(Inbr(Procr). Resurrection does not appear in this derivation because it is not a sexual instinct. Resurrection is not based on birthing, it is just a word.

Because reincarnation is repressed by Islam and suppressed by Muslim males, a dangerous situation has now arisen. The unconscious of Muslim males can now operate as a dissociative identity from Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID).

This is how honor killing arises.

THIS IS THE CAUSE OF HONOR KILLING:

Muslim faith is a hybrid religion of reincarnation (unconscious) and resurrection (conscious):

Reincarnation in inbred populations is fueled only by testosterone. Females commit no honor killings:

More images of a failed reincarnation projection:

Religion is a projection on breeding.

Where do we come from?

Fallacy of Islam:

Fallacy of Islam:

You cannot change an inbred population ex cathedra into an outbred population:

Serial monotheism exists when only males can reincarnate into the male bloodline, because females simply come from Adam's rib without own DNA (cousin marriages). They are just incubators for family sperm. They are not subjects but objects without any personal identity:

Homo sapiens, the deluded species

Monotheism= f(SM-dyad (Inbreeding)).
Polytheism= f(Vanilla-dyad (Outbreeding)).

Assumption 676: The Constitution of Multiculturalism.
Human religion is the rationalization of the male sexual drive in the unconscious, intended to coerce female sexuality for the pleasure of males.
Human religion is also a projection on breeding, where inbreeding cultures by definition treat people differently in terms of equality.
By providing protection for these discriminatory religions under the Moral Constitution of Western society, which purports to be the guardian of justice, the injustice of inbreeding cultures has been given a status of legal inviolability that is in direct conflict with the spirit of the Constitution.
In this way a Constitution has been created that protects inequality, murder and manslaughter.
This tragedy is the greatest fallacy of Western narrow-mindedness and conceit.
As the crowning glory of Western civilization, religion has long been seen as humanity's highest ethical value, protected by the United Nations Moral Constitution and Human Rights Watch.
But rarely has civilized man better demonstrated his moral incapacity. Therefore, in evolution, masochistic polytheism always digs its own grave, swallowed up by sadistic monotheism.

Assumption 681: Curtain falls over morality Western Culture.

If both, the perpetrator and the victim must be spared from sharp criticism, then there is no ethics left in our woke society and then the curtain falls over morality of Western culture.

The purpose of ethics

The purpose of ethics is to protect the weaker from the stronger. In this way one protects unborn life against the arbitrariness of the mother, the daughter against her father, the lamb against the lion, outbreeding against inbreeding and therefore polytheism against monotheism.

But what if both need to be protected. That's what the Constitution intends. How can one protect the lion without it eating the lamb? Well that's self-deception. There are therefore limits to ethics where ethics go against the laws of nature. And that is also why the Moral Constitution of Western Society cannot protect victims of discriminatory religions against honor killings, stoning, murder and manslaughter. Or is masochistic Christianity wallowing in its twisted but self-fulfilling prophecy?

Assumption 681: Curtain falls over morality Western Culture.

If both, the perpetrator and the victim must be spared from sharp criticism, then there is no ethics left in our woke society and then the curtain falls over morality of Western culture.

In other words: Does the Moral Constitution of Western society - what a joke - unconsciously aim to surrender to monotheism, whereby polytheism always naturally disintegrates as a matter of time, while monotheism as a closed inbreeding culture remains integrally stable and coherent?

Assumption 677: SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad.

SM-dyad is a sexual instinct caused by inbreeding and found exclusively in bipedal primates (humans). Animals do not systematically practice inbreeding and therefore have no need for SM-dyad. Animals would also not be able to control SM-dyad, which would lead to its dissolution into rape and murder and extinction of the species. After all, animal females would certainly disagree with the lustful masochism of human females, without which SM-dyad cannot exist.

Vanilla-dyad emerged as a civilized cultural intervention on SM-dyad through human outbreeding. But SM-dyad is much stronger and will always prevail. Vanilla-dyad is not yet seen as a Sexual Instinct (SI) on this blog. But it is certainly possible that Vanilla-dyad still has some deep roots in animal sexuality, but not in contrast to SM-dyad.

Basic Dimension

(362) The Origin of the Myth of Abraham

Number Archive

(439) Reincarnation and Resurrection

Reincarnation and Resurrection.

Assumption 679: Reincarnation and Resurrection.

Homo naledi (2.3 Mya - 236 Ka; 550cc) was an Australopithecus with an excellently functioning speech center in his small 'animal brain'. A brain, however, based on a simple but reasonably complete human design. A basic human brain inherited from 'natural thinking animals'. This means that even Australopiths from 3 million years ago could speak and apparently didn't believe in the soul and the afterlife and that kind of psychotic nonsense. Because that's why you need an enlarged psychotic brain.

And also interesting: from 2.3 million years to 236 thousand years ago, Homo naledi probably remained the same unchanged creature, all individuals of which looked alike and were copies of each other. A clear indication of extreme inbreeding as a balanced dog race.

Homo naledi was more civilized in a religious sense than Homo sapiens and did not bluntly throw his deaths into CO2 neutral ovens, but conscientiously 'buried' them deep down in the Rising Star Cave (Johannesburg) near the God of Darkness to bring their bodies to life again as renewed fetuses with original DNA and personality (Just like Muslims btw):

As a natural thinker, with only half a brain, Homo naledi did not need a soul to replace himself somewhere in another life. The God of Darkness simply extended his previous life through rebirth without a soul.

Then, it is quite understandable to expect psychotic Homo erectus with his extremely enlarged brain (900cc) to believe in the soul and reincarnation.

Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) could not accept that he was nothing more than his body without any eternal identity and so he postulated the soul. His soul also had to reincarnate him long after death into the right tribe where he belonged. That tribe could also be an inbred population.

But for inbreeding cultures this meant the difficult task of preserving family genome through 'cousin marriages' for the male bloodline and also of keeping offspring of females free from alien seed caused by adultery (hybrids: Eve's Serpent).

Daughters therefore had to reinforce XY-DNA of the male lineage with their female XX-DNA (cousin marriages), which incidentally also came from Adam's rib and so also from the male bloodline.

This all, for not to reincarnate into hybrids of unknown origin and thereafter to be refused from re-entering their tribes as bastards themselves. After which they had to wander as ghosts through space forever in tribal separation anxiety.

In these days, daughters knew very well why they had to neglect their inborn outbreeding instinct, while propagating the male bloodline. But in nowadays Muslim culture, nobody knows where cousin marriages are really meant for because reincarnation is repressed in the unconscious on pain of death for already 1400 years.

The bottom line is when Muslim girls would know what is really happening to them, they would lose unreasonable fear and would be much more capable of taking countermeasures.

Homo sapiens also believed in reincarnation, which had become a Sexual Instinct (SI) in two million years and is unconsciously still vividly alive in Muslim populations, despite their conscious belief in resurrection with Allah in heaven.

Fallacy of Islam: You cannot change an inbred population ex cathedra into an outbred population:

Conditioning reincarnation (magically) on the birth process made it just another superstrong (magically and thus not really needed) sexual instinct within 2 million years. This because the primal sexual law in nature is bond to birthing and directed to outbreeding to prevent extinction of species. And because religion is just a rational interpretation of an unconscious sexual instinct, religion is also a projection on breeding in the first place.

The problem with resurrection is that it explicitly has nothing to do with procreation, with breeding, with the birth process, or propagation of the species. This means that resurrection is not a Sexual Instinct (SI). Resurrection is nothing but a meaningless word, a joke in religion. And that is precisely why the Muslim faith will have to indoctrinate Islam until the end of time to keep repressed the ineradicable magical reincarnation instinct linked to inbreeding. It's a hopeless endeavor.

Homo sapiens inherited reincarnation from Homo erectus. Reincarnation with outbreeding was no problem (FGM) but with inbreeding it became disastrous, because Homo sapiens had a less varied genome than Homo erectus. That's why Desert Religions were terrified from autosomal recessive disorders caused by extreme inbreeding.

They told believers that resurrection to God in heaven would prevent the birth process and that their own bodies would be reconstructed before God with their own souls and original DNA. That would suit them better than reincarnation through inbreeding.

Well, apart from the needless soul this is exactly Rebirth from Homo naledi. And they also told believers how stupid cousin marriages were because reincarnation into descendants after so many generations caused impaired family genomes through mismatches from adulterous females.

Another point they will have said is that the body forms the soul, just as modern psychology learns about self identity. And so Desert Religions tried to throw sand in the eyes of believers to become God's Representatives on earth.

But as said before, Desert Religions did not understand that religion is a function of breeding. And that's why they told believers in vain to follow resurrection, where reincarnation is a super strong (magical) sexual instinct.

As long as humans do not understand where religion comes from they will have less brains than Homo naledi. He did not believe in resurrection in heaven and also not in the soul. He believed in rebirth on earth with his own self identity and his own DNA but not in some fake universe from psychotic cauliflower brains.

The Bible does not mention the word 'reincarnation':

The Bible does not mention reincarnation, which is without a doubt the most important breakthrough in human religion in evolution. Instead, the Bible talks about idols (polytheism).

This blog doesn't follow history, it creates human religion:

(271) Myth of Abraham and the Sacrifice Feast

(309) The real Myth of Abraham

(343) Why Desert Religions reversed the Myth of Abraham

(347) True Myth of Abraham: settling dispute Homo erectus and Homo sapiens

(381) How to make sense of the cruel Myth of Abraham

So reincarnation (below) became polytheism and the one God in heaven monotheism. As a result resurrection changed erroneously into monotheism:

But Heaven in the parallel universe must be polytheistic and based on nature's primary sexual law: outbreeding. Like the 72 virgins from other tribes:

Desert Religions tried to outlaw inbreeding and incest because Homo sapiens had a very impoverished genome and fell prey to autosomal recessive disorders. This is in contrast to Australopithecus and Homo erectus.

But with monotheism they also tried to rob tribal heads of reincarnation cultures of their divine power to determine their own afterlife on the basis of inbreeding. They took all the power in the Bible, as God's substitute on earth, while worshiping idols, both male and female sexual roles, is the only 'healthy' religion. The Bible is therefore decadent.

Our definition of religion:

According to our definition of religion, Judaism and Christianity are actually polytheistic (outbreeding) and only Islam is monotheistic (partly inbreeding/partly outbreeding). Polytheism is when both male and female sexual roles are divinely worshiped (Baal: outbreeding). Then both sexes could also reincarnate.

In monotheism there is only a single (male) God (inbreeding). Serial monotheism is when only males reincarnate into the male bloodline (inbreeding cultures).

As mentioned previously on this blog, Judaism believes itself to be monotheistic (inbreeding) because it worships only one God of male heterosexuality (and not also Baal, who gave sexual power to women, which combination between two peoples would amount to outbreeding) .

But in contemporary Judaism, women's mt-DNA determines group identity because women in sexual freedom can choose their husbands (which is cutting corners in this discussion). So the Jewish Bible calls itself monotheistic, while this blog concludes that their actual religion must be polytheistic. And indeed, Jewish women can simply marry non-Jewish men (outbreeding), which, in short, makes their children Jewish.

Though matrilineal descent was not obligatory, yet matrilineal mt-DNA became a selection criterion, giving 'female sexual roles' an empathetic place in the conscious of Jews. The influx of not Jewish males completed the population to outbreeding.

https://www.gotquestions.org/Baal-and-Asherah.html

Why was the worship of Baal and Asherah a constant struggle for the Israelites?

'Throughout the Old Testament, we read accounts of idol worship among the Israelites, especially the worship of Baal and Asherah, or sometimes Baal and Ashtoreth. The paganism that surrounded God’s people crept in, gained a foothold, and led to much misery. It was a constant struggle to stay true to the Lord their God.'

'God had commanded Israel not to worship idols (Exodus 20:3; Deuteronomy 5:7)—indeed, they were to avoid even mentioning a false god’s name (Exodus 23:13). To prevent compromise, they were warned not to intermarry with the pagan nations and to shun practices that might be construed as pagan worship rites (Leviticus 20:23; 2 Kings 17:15; Ezekiel 11:12).

' There are several reasons why the worship of Baal and Asherah was such a problem for Israel. First, the worship of Baal and Asherah held the allure of illicit sex, since the religion involved ritual prostitution. This is exactly what we see in the incident of Baal of Peor, as “the men began to indulge in sexual immorality with Moabite women, who invited them to the sacrifices to their gods” (Numbers 25:1–2). During this episode an Israelite named Zimri brazenly brought a Midianite woman into the camp and went straight to his tent, where the two began having sex (verses 6–8, 14–15).'

What we see above is the same as in Islam, where Muslim women have to marry Muslims. Essentially this is inbreeding, but the large domain of available Muslim males actually results in outbreeding.

And that is why Islam today is polytheistic, while its earlier inbreeding culture was (serial) monotheistic (inbreeding).

What we also see above is that the Jewish Bible pursued political goals in destroying those who worshiped idols. They tried to prevent outbreeding with women of Baal, in favor of the closed identity of the Jewish people. But the lion's share of idol worshipers were believers of reincarnation who wanted to be born into their descendants through inbreeding. And that is why the Bible makes no mention of reincarnation, while the worship of idols actually concerns it most:

Basic Dimension

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Iran,-father-murders-daughter-after-elopement.-
Activists-and-civil-society-in-revolt-50199.html

Number Archive

(440) Honor Killing Proneness

THE KEY TO HONOR KILLING:

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

Beware of what you don't want to be:

Are you thinking about suicide? We can all help prevent suicide.

https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/ Call 1-800-273-8255 (USA).

Are you thinking about suicide? We can all help prevent suicide

https://www.113.nl › i › zelfmoord. Bel 112 of 113 of 0900-0113

Denk jij aan zelfmoord? Trek dan zo snel mogelijk aan de bel.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/suicide/suicide-prevention-hotlines-resources-worldwide

The baseline of the threat of honor killing is your relationship with your father, which you must monitor closely from entering . pubertyYou expect your father to love you the way he always did, and never will harm you. But that's a delusion, because his ''love'' for you may take on quite another dimension. He may "love" you so much that he would like to merge with you forever by being reborn into your descendants. That's reincarnation through inbreeding. He wants to preserve family DNA through cousin marriage and you must play for incubator, as breeding ground for family sperm.

So, his love for you can just turn into sick 'love'. Similar to the kind of love in which psychotic men eventually kill their unrequited "love". Romina Ashrafi's father loved his daughter dearly but became reincarnation psychotic when she 'let him down' for another man with disapproved DNA.

It starts when he unconsciously claims your body as an incubator for family sperm. You will remain a subject, a person if you don't argue about marrying his nephew, his projected stand in, by the way. But you will become an object, a thing by distorting his reincarnation delusion. Then he no longer sees you as a person. The remedy is to be diplomatic and to avoid any answer, other than "I'm not yet ready to decide to marry my cousin."

The longer your father continues to push you into a cousin marriage, the stronger his reincarnation psychosis takes shape. Mind you, as long as you don't provide a definitive answer, he will remain hopeful, but at some point you will have to plan your flight and then never come back. Because out of sight, out of mind.

But due to this lack of communication, your father will no longer see you as a subject and if you ever return 'to make amendments', he will kill you as an object like Sadia Sheikh (killed by her brother Mudusar btw *) and Romina Ashrafi.

This simply because he lost the 'subject counterweight' from his conscious and now is only left with his unconscious reincarnation drive, in which he only sees you as an incubator of family semen:

So, you are still his beloved daughter if he experiences you every day and if you maintain good relationships. In this you are the subject of his daughter.

But if you argue about his desire to marry your cousin or accepting another forced marriage, you will create conflicts that you should have avoided. And it's here that you can delay your own honor killing.

Much has been written about this on this blog and here only in general terms.

Finally: From puberty onwards, your father might see you as a thing (an object) and as a person (a subject) at the same time.

You are a thing if he uses you for inbreeding due to his his unconscious reincarnation drive.

And you remain a subject if you don't argue about marrying his nephew, his projected stand in.

A difficult complication is that girls in puberty become increasingly distant from their fathers with more and more conflicts, which is a natural development. All this requires more diplomacy from Muslim girls than could be expected.

And if you ever run away from home, never go to the police in Muslim countries, because they will take you back home like in the case of Romina Ashrafi. Because yes, ultimately police officers are also fathers with daughters...

'Romina Ashrafi ran away from home with her 34-year-old boyfriend after her father banned them from getting married, Arab news channel Al Jazeera reports. However, the couple was found by police five days later. Although Romina told them she feared for her life, officers sent the teenager back home to Talesh, a small town more than three hundred kilometers northwest of capital Tehran.'

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/28/romina-ashrafi-outcry-in-iran-over-so-called-honour-killing-of-14-year-old-girl

* THE TRAGEDY OF SADIA SHEIKH

*(353) Sadia Sheikh: Legal implications Reincarnation Theory (2021)

(147) The Muslim instinct (Sadia Sheikh) (2017)

(230) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial 🔴 (2018)

(336) The flaw in the Sadia Sheikh trial (2020)

NB: This blog claims that reincarnation through inbreeding (with honor killing as collateral damage) is a deeply ingrained sexual instinct from Homo erectus. But then this is genetically passed on from father to son. Cultural transmission is not decisive*. In addition, it must be testosterone controlled. Young men have a higher testosterone level. So Mudusar Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim's brother may be right that their fathers were not (directly) involved in the murder and they indeed acted on their own, igniting earlier than their fathers:

* Honor killing is not supported by the Quran and has been a taboo topic of discussion within and between rural families in Pakistan and Iran for the past 1,400 years. Families also had virtually no contact with each other and cultural transmission across families was therefore less likely, although honor killings occurred on a large scale and almost identically across families.

These people had no idea what was really happening to them:

(146) Consanguineous marriages

(154) Coefficient of Inbreeding (C.O.I.)

(437) Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID))

Honor killing proneness of a family

A measure of possible incidence of honor killing in a family with fertile and marriageable females is the product of 'the sum score of the probabilities of DID for all males' and 'the inbreeding coefficient of that family', divided by 1 or the number of fertile female candidates willing to marry by consanguinity.

Explanation:

'DID for all males':

- Muslim male relatives with severe mood swings

or long-term depression are a risk factor, unlike moderate,

stable characters with a cheerful disposition.

Split personalities or multiple personalities, especially

with unknown and therefore unconscious Alters (DID),

are an important risk factor.

'Inbreeding coefficient':

- The inbreeding coefficient relates to the severity and

duration of inbreeding over generations, because

harmful effects can be amplified over time.

Moral responsibility:

- The conclusion reached in this blog is that honor killers

should certainly be held responsible for their actions in

a legal sense, but this is questionable in a moral

sense.

(437) Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

(154) Coefficient of Inbreeding (C.O.I.)
(156) Coefficient of Relationship (C.O.R.)

Coefficient of Inbreeding:

The Coefficient of Inbreeding (as proposed by Sewell Wright in 1922) is the probability that two alleles at a randomly chosen locus are identical by descent. Note that alleles may be identical for other reasons, but the inbreeding coefficient is just looking at the mathematical probability that the alleles have come from a common ancestor.

The Coefficient of Relationship (R) looks more a descriptive statistic of consanguinity relations within families. For example a father and his child have 50% of their genes in common. The same for two siblings. So it is not directly a probability for specific individual situations.

Basic Dimension

Number Archive

(441) Honor Killing in Islamic Culture

Honor killing in Islamic culture

Fallacy of Islam:

You cannot change an inbred population ex cathedra into an outbred population:

Reincarnation is a super strong Sexual Instinct (SI). Resurrection is just an empty word:

PREFACE:

THE TRUE MYTH OF ABRAHAM:

THE LIE IN ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS:

The false myth of Abraham is a deliberate distortion of history by Desert Religions.

This blog is based on bottom-up religious research:

PRIMATE RELIGIOUS DEVELOPMENT

THE SOLUTION TO HONOR KILLINGS:

RELIGIONS ARE PROJECTIONS ON BREEDING

INBREEDING & ISLAM

GENESIS COMES FROM HOMO ERECTUS' INBREEDING CULTURE,

BUT THEY ALSO PRACTICED OUTBREEDING.

PARADISE CULTURES

INBREEDING IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH OUTBREEDING:

REINCARNATION IS A STRONG SEXUAL INSTINCT

FROM HOMO ERECTUS. BUT RESURRECTION IS

JUST AN EMPTY WORD FROM HOMO SAPIENS:

ACTUAL COURSE OF EVENTS

STATE OF THE ART: CAUSES OF HONOR KILLINGS ARE PLACED IN THE CONSCIOUS BY CONTEMPORARY SCIENCE:

STATE OF NATURE:

HOW ISLAM CAUSES HONOR KILLINGS THROUGH REPRESSION

OF REINCARNATION IN THE UNCONSCIOUS OF MUSLIM MALES

ISLAM AS HYBRID RELIGION

CHRISTIANITY USED AN ORTHOGONAL TRANSFORMATION NOT TO BE COMPROMISED BY THE MYTH OF PARADISE FROM HOMO ERECTUS:

Basic Dimension

Number Archive

(434) Fundamental principles of this blog

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES

This blog doesn't follow history,

it creates human religion:

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THIS BLOG

Monotheism= f(SM-dyad (Inbreeding)).
Polytheism= f(Vanilla-dyad (Outbreeding)).

Assumption 677: SM-dyad and Vanilla-dyad.

THE BASIC DIMENSION OF RELIGION:

INBREEDING------OUTBREEDING:

(284) New foundations human religion, HR = f(SR)
(285) Honor killings, how it's made, HR = f(SR)
(286) HR = f(SR), Human Religion, Sexual Religion

(414) Magical and natural religious vectors: HR= f(SR)

(429) Human Religion (HR) from Animal Religion (AR)

Further analysis

Breeding is a sexual instinct in the unconscious: But Breeding has also a sexual image in the conscious:

For thinking about Breeding in the conscious, we need first to transfer an image of the Sexual Instinct (SI) 'Breeding' from the unconscious to the conscious. This because one cannot consciously take the function Reinc.= f(Inbreeding). from the unknown sexual instinct 'Breeding' in the unconscious:

Resurrection is no Sexual Instinct (SI). It's a made up idea of Homo sapiens. It is a powerless argument from a delusion and because it is not tied to the birth process it is not a sexual instinct:

But that is only a provisional convention because we see already in the projections below that Islam and Christianity are not completely determined by their projection on Breeding:

(So, orthogonal to Breeding there are more predictor dimensions)

In a final convention we must be able to gather all newly created predictors of Islam and Christianity in the conscious, contributing to further updates and adaptations of their religions.

This means that a religion is first reformulated in the conscious mind and only later takes shape in the unconscious during evolution.

That is also how reincarnation from Homo erectus (2.2 Mya; 900cc) became linked to the Sexual Instinct (SI) of Breeding. Reincarnation isn't really necessary for birthing, but because Homo erectus believed that for 2 million years, it became magically connected to and conditioned on Breeding.

Reformulated religion:

The peacock's train is also only magically conditioned on breeding, it is not essential, because with cut trains the species will not die out and court behavior will change in further evolution, so this train is not essential for breeding.

(Reincarnation is also only magically attached to Breeding, because I do not think it exists in reality)

Why is Breeding that important? Well, Breeding is the primal determinant of sexuality. Even today, 85% or more of the world's religions are a projection on, or a function of Breeding:

'Religion' (shaping female sexual behavior) has been a function of breeding from the beginning of sexual life in nature. And now, in the 21st century, at least 85% of human religions are still functions of inbreeding or outbreeding.

Sexual Instincts (SI) and Sexual Religions (SR)

Resurrection is just a powerless word, no sexual instinct and only an artificial function of Reincarnation:

Resurrection is just a powerless word, no sexual instinct:

PLAY WITH IMAGES:

More images of a failed reincarnation projection:

Projections on Breeding:

OUR STRATEGY REGARDING HONOR KILLINGS

The first reason Muslim culture has never solved honor killings is that they did not go through the Enlightenment and subsequent Romanticism, the latter of which put the spotlight on the unconscious in the Western world:

In the Muslim world, males hide their sexual identity in their unconscious, which has terrible consequences. Women, on the other hand, express their personality more in the conscious.

Therefore Muslim males are monotheistic, but females are polytheistic: they do not suppress empathy for sexual roles in their unconscious. (On this blog, gods are sexual roles.)

Therefore, women oversee life much better in reality, which gives them power over men:

But although women are in power, they suffer terrible consequences from their

lusty SM-dyad with men. And that's right, because there is no SM if not both parties are into it, because suffering is lust in masochism.

(If tomorrow a billion Muslim women were to reject SM-dyad and start to live in equality with men, without Sharia law, Islam would have to change, because it takes two to tango.)

A second reason Muslim culture has never solved honor killings is that a single honor killing sets a deterrent example for countless other Muslim girls, causing them to anxiously agree to 'cousin marriage'.

But if Muslim girls had a sound theory, much of that fear would be allayed and they would arrive at rational judgments and decisions. They would develop an adequate strategy and be able to effectively avoid honor killing:

Then they would understand the following:

The tragic battle between an empty word and a super strong sexual instinct

The right theory always predicts the future. But for our purposes, we are just looking for any theory that rightly predicts honor killings. To this end and as our first assumption, we integrate 'reincarnation as a sexual instinct' as auxiliary hypothesis into our honor killing theory, which so far only focused on resurrection of Islam. It provides a theoretically perfect match for predicting honor killings.

The second assumption underlying our theory is that in nature sexual instincts are conditioned on the birth process, on breeding, on procreating the species. Religion is also such a sexual instinct, where reincarnation is (magically) conditioned on breeding but resurrection explicitly not. Then, reincarnation is a strong sexual instinct but resurrection just a powerless word. Therefore Islam can never defeat its previous inbreeding culture by indoctrinating resurrection. Not in another 1400 years:

As long as Islam enforces resurrection in the conscious of Muslim males, honor killings will be created by reincarnation psychosis in their unconscious.

The lie of Desert Religions:

Desert religions don't deserve to be called 'Abrahamic Religions', because they

have stolen the myth of Abraham and reversed its original meaning completely to become surrogates of God on earth, substitutes that took away divine self-determination from tribal heads in reincarnation and instead replaced extreme inbreeding by resurrection in heaven. Only combating 'inbreeding through reincarnation' replaced with resurrection is to be commended.

God, who is feared and honored by Islam for his misunderstood and alleged intention to slaughter a child, was in reality the compromise between reincarnation of Homo erectus and resurrection of Homo sapiens:

The concept of earthly reincarnation was developed much earlier than heavenly resurrection:

The festival of sacrifice shows the joy of Muslims because God is not as cruel as the myth of Abraham would indicate. God fulfills their unconscious and forbidden desire for reincarnation and combines it with resurrection. Here we see a joyful embrace of the fractured Islamic faith, in which suppressed reincarnation and enforced resurrection culminate in an annual burst of unified faith.

How to fight honor killings:

But there is a way out for Muslim women by raising awareness about the real nature of honor killings and thereby avoiding unwarranted trust in fathers or brothers, leading to the right avoidance strategy in time, as suggested on many places in this blog:

(282) How to prevent honor killings 🔴🔴

Muslim respect for women depends on submission

IT'S ALL ABOUT MORALITY

Basic Dimension

(2) Human religion, the timelessness derivative of sexuality

Number Archive

(435) Introduction into bipedal primate religion

CREATION OF SEXUAL RELIGION (DID)

(435) Introduction into bipedal primate religion

This blog doesn't follow history,

it creates human religion:

(4) Human religion as operant conditioning
(11) The Fundamental Equation in Human Religion
(197) Homo naledi is the game changer of human religion
(256) Homo naledi: inbreeding slows down human evolution
(260) The Origin of Human Religion
(274) The Formula of Sexual Religion
(284) New foundations human religion, HR = f(SR)
(285) Honor killings, how it's made, HR = f(SR)
(286) HR = f(SR), Human Religion, Sexual Religion
(307) Intermittent reinforcement, magic wand of human religion
(394) Human Religion integrates SM-dyad with Breeding
(395) The Fundamental Equation in Human Religion
(414) Magical and natural religious vectors: HR= f(SR)
(424) Core dimensions of Human Religion
(429) Human Religion (HR) from Animal Religion (AR)

This blog doesn't follow history,

it creates human religion

(434) Introduction into bipedal primate religion

(42) The Split in Panini Religion

(299) Chimps and bonobos have no SM-dyad

(370) Chimpanzees and bonobos

(190) Australopithecus interbred with Homo sapiens?

(249) Disastrous inbreeding with bipedal primates
(250) Spear defense was a necessary condition for bipedality
(261) The myth of the bipedal mutation

(290) Homo naledi was our australopithecine ancestor

Male chimpanzees inbreed into the male bloodline, but as a result avoid total inbreeding because young females run away to other tribes when they reach sexual maturity:

But this does not apply to bipedal primates that left the forests and virtually no longer encountered each other. They often had to practice incest and inbreeding in order to survive at all:

(112) The Myth of Abraham: Polytheism versus Monotheism

(113) The Myth of Abraham: Inbreeding versus Monotheism

(234) China fears polytheism

(239) Political correctness is basically polytheism

(267) Polytheism, monotheism, sexual identity and conscience

Polytheism means that all sexual roles are experienced empathetically in the conscious (the ancient Greeks). But then eventually by mingling, the boundaries between cultures and races disappear. Then we get miscegenation and cultural identity loss (Christianity). Everything has its price and polytheism comes down to outbreeding and monotheism to xenophobia and inbreeding (Muslim faith):

The major difference between open (polytheism) and closed cultures (monotheism) is the close bond between members of the latter. While polytheism always disintegrates into separate individuals without any overarching sense of norms and values (American democrats after Christianity: Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Post Modernism, Wokism). This means that closely knit monotheistic cultures (Critical Race Theory, Muslim faith) always win out over polytheism in evolution, because ultimately only them can make a stand. That's why they are called 'superior religions', nothing to do with ethical quality:

(245) Super religions are caused by inbreeding

(246) Superior and inferior religions

(327) Serial monotheism in superior religions

(391) Super religions and inferior religions

(426) Superior and inferior religions

Monotheism is ultimately stronger than polytheism in bipedal evolution. These religions alternate as ebb and flow throughout evolution. There is no substantive evolution in religion, the reason why Homo naledi respectfully kept its dead in the Rising Star Cave while modern humans set them on fire with clean energy:

(284) New foundations human religion, HR = f(SR)
(285) Honor killings, how it's made, HR = f(SR)
(286) HR = f(SR), Human Religion, Sexual Religion
(414) Magical and natural religious vectors: HR= f(SR)
(429) Human Religion (HR) from Animal Religion (AR)

All human religions are basically derived from breeding. Only later derivatives move away from this basis:

Guess what, 'religion' (shaping female sexual behavior) has been a function of breeding from the beginning of sexual life in nature. And now, in the 21st century, 85% of human religions are still functions of inbreeding or outbreeding. Do you want better proof?

Islam is outbreeding established on its former inbreeding culture:

Here we need to make a clarification because we conveniently call Islam an inbreeding culture, which it still closely resembles as mixture with its former culture, but Desert Religions strove for outbreeding, in which Islam failed miserably:

Religions are male control over female behavior. They arise from each other as derivatives of previous functions and sometimes drift away from breeding:

Religious space is derived from the physiological sexual space in the brain. Religion is an interpretation of sexuality. Animals have no religious space, so sexual space is in their unconscious as well as their conscious. But in humans sexual space is often repressed in the unconscious, while religious space is male's secret language-coded counterpart in the conscious:

(220) Retrieving the unconscious (Convergence Theory)

(415) Conscious (hate), unconscious ('love'), Honor Killings

Women are not sexually or physically attracted to male homosexual behavior, although they psychologically identify with Jesus:

So, to deceive women, males condemned homosexuality to the unconscious (DID). Also because otherwise monotheism would become polytheism on accepting homosexuality as 'a second god', as a second empathetically felt sexual role in the conscious.

And so, an interesting interaction arose between 'religion' and sexuality, between conscious religion (monotheism) and unconscious sexuality (homosexuality), in which one feels the contradiction, the flaw in trying taking over God's identity. Because men must be like God to rule over women and therefore they absurdly deny their possible homosexual roots in their awkward homo-erotic relationship with God:

So to sexually dominate women, heterosexual men are conditional, and there are no two flavors in that. Is this then a sexual consideration in the unconscious or a religious one in the conscious? It is both, an interesting combination, where empathy with homosexuality in the conscious would amount to acceptance of a second sexual role as a second god.

But then male power over women would disappear and SM-dyad would switch from monotheism to Vanilla-dyad of polytheism, in which women should be given equal sexual rights, which is contrary to monotheism.

That is the unsolvable dilemma of sneaky monotheism: Needing a homo-erotic relationship to worship their heterosexual God, but at the same time appearing heterosexual in order to oppress and impress women:

Monotheism:

(344) The Archetype of God, AKA the Space of gods

(345) Gods are sexual roles

(367) Gods are sexual roles

The ancient Greeks believed that the gods took on sexual roles in their contact with humans. But because we don't believe in gods, the ancient Greeks simply worshiped sexual roles as gods. So we turn this around.

If women are not empathetically worshiped in the conscious, then they are objects from Adam's rib. As befits an inbreeding culture, Eve then had the same DNA as Adam, meaning that female DNA was plowed back into the male bloodline through cousin marriages (extreme inbreeding).

(10) God’s Creations

(5) Honor killings caused by inbreeding and incest

(32) The Archetype of God

(102) Religion through the sound barrier of the animal kingdom

(232) The Archetype of God

Polytheism and monotheism are the axis around which human cultures revolve. It gives direction to the archetypes of 'Religion', 'Law' and 'Dialectic process between the sexes':

Polytheism:

(32) The Archetype of God

(102) Religion through the sound barrier of the animal kingdom

(232) The Archetype of God

(345) Gods are sexual roles

(367) Gods are sexual roles

(193) Masochism love, hate and fear

Where to find the assumptions:

(74) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 2: 60-119)

Assumption 1: God is a sexual ideal projection of higher mammals in the alpha male. He personifies the role of polygamous heterosexuality.

Assumption 2: Gods are sexual roles.

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality

Only for women is god space identical to the full 5-dimensional sexual space. After all, women themselves belong to 'other sexual roles' on the third dimension. So they already feel empathy with other sexual roles in their conscious. Note that empathy is different from sympathy. (Note also that it is not really a rank 5 space, but two space. It is 5 principal components.)

But in men, sexual space shrinks in their conscious towards adulthood to only one empathetic dimension: male heterosexuality. Men are therefore disabled where the religious bond between the conscious and unconscious is concerned:

(74) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 2: 60-119)

Assumption 68: In humans, the number of gods in the archetype of God is by nature unlimited (polytheism), with SM-dyad as principal component (main factor) of the space of gods. By testosterone (monotheism) this number of god factors is gradually restricted to one dimension, called SM-dyad or Allah construct. With estrogen multi-dimensionality remains unaffected. This means that males tend to monotheism and females to polytheism.

(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales

(16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam

(92) Sadomasochism in the focal caught

(93) Christianity lost SM-dyad

(99) Breaking sadomasochism

(244) SM-dyad broken down by masochism hate and fear⚠️

(265) Sadomasochism, Masochism hate and fear (Tahrir Square)

(294) Omvolking is a sadomasochistic entanglement

(299) Chimps and bonobos have no SM-dyad

(371) Muslims lack control over SM-dyad

(392) Political Correctness craves for SM-dyad

(394) Human Religion integrates SM-dyad with Breeding

(396) The SM-dyad / Vanilla-dyad ratio

(394) Human Religion integrates SM-dyad with Breeding

(74) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 2: 60-119)

(NB: rank less than 5. Five principal components)

Assumption 68: In humans, the number of interdependent gods (n) in the polytheistic space of gods (rank=m=5 vectors) in the archetype of God (rank=p=5 factors) is unlimited, with the SM-dyad as principal component (main factor) (p=1). SM-dyad is called 'monotheism' otherwise. With male testosterone this space will be gradually restricted to only one conscious dimension (p=1), the SM-dyad or Allah-construct, named otherwise monotheism or sadomasochism. Remaining (m-p=4) components are relegated to the unconscious. But in case of estrogen all sexual factors (p=5) remain unaffected in the conscious of women.

Note that religious space is a male interpretation of sexual space, which was not necessary if sexual space was lived fully and empathetically in the conscious. Note also that SM-dyad in bipedal sexual space is identical to monotheism in god space, although with different perspectives (see blue picture with the archetypes above) both dimensions may differ slightly from each other.

(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales

(16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam

(193) Masochism love, hate and fear

(244) SM-dyad broken down by masochism hate and fear⚠️

(265) Sadomasochism, Masochism hate and fear (Tahrir Square)

(368) Masochism hate: Rosetta stone to Islam (Tahrir Square)

Although 'other sexual roles' have been repressed to the unconscious in monotheism, this does not mean that they no longer play a significant role (DID). Examples include 'masochism hate' and 'masochism fear', while 'reincarnation psychosis' also arises in the unconscious as cognitive dissonance with 'resurrection' in the conscious:

In monotheism we can say that men are blind (black) to empathy for other sexual roles that are not worshiped in their religion:

(165) Tragedy: The battle of gods from Adam and Eve

(Egotheism from Australopithecus)

Adam: Verily I say unto thee, I have created God as my likeness. His gratitude was great and I got the dominion over all creation. That I also get eternal life.

Adam: Immortality is all that God could give to me. In my children my strong body rushes to eternity. They are like God as my likeness. So I will survive forever and be an example for humanity. Yes, indeed, I am a God in the deepest of my thoughts.

Adam: Eve, come to your senses, thou hast no soul. Thou art like a goat. Only men have a soul. Hast thou a soul than thou were a man. Thou are not a man, so do not fall into circular reasoning. Be satisfied with my beautiful body and do not talk of God, unless to praise me.

(209) Religion is a kind of breeding

(236) Scaling Christianity

(260) The Origin of Human Religion

(180) Homosexuality and fertility stress

(80) Why gay people must be sick

(91) Why Muslims kill homosexuals

(180) Homosexuality and fertility stress

(233) Homo-erotic coping strategies in desert religions
(235) Homosexual schizophrenia in Christianity

(296) Omvolking is yet another Sodom and Gomorrah

(297) Sodom and Canada

(425) Sodom and Gomorrah show the true face of Monotheism

(77) Homo naledi from rebirth to reincarnation

(142) FGM, Inbreeding and reincarnation

(159) Proof belief of earthly reincarnation into descendants

(257) Homo naledi: The Rebirth - Reincarnation Theory

(259) Homo erectus: Migration triggered reincarnation

(293) Why Islam (resurrection) will never defeat Inbreeding (reincarnation)

(314) Conflict Reincarnation Resurrection

(334) Honor killings are Reincarnation killings

(335) Reincarnation psychosis

(338) Reincarnation Muslims are held hostage by Islam

(353) Sadia Sheikh: Legal implications Reincarnation Theory

(355) Conflict Reincarnation Resurrection

(383) What the Bible says about reincarnation and ascension

(416) No one warned Romina Ashrafi about Reincarnation Psychosis

(419) Woman's power over resurrection and reincarnation, but not over FGM

(293) Why Islam (resurrection) will never defeat Inbreeding (reincarnation)

(314) Conflict Reincarnation Resurrection

(315) Why resurrection is some function of breeding

(355) Conflict Reincarnation Resurrection

(373) Desert Religions pursued resurrection in heaven (genetic diversity)

(419) Woman's power over resurrection and reincarnation, but not over FGM

Basic Dimension
https://sexualreligion.blogspot.com
Number Archive

(436) Creation of Honor Killings

CREATION OF HONOR KILLINGS (DID)

(436) Creation of Honor Killings

(92) Sadomasochism in the focal caught

(260) The Origin of Human Religion

(312) Honor Killing Standard (Romina Ashrafi)

(319) The Truth about honor killings (Romina Ashrafi)

(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales

(93) Christianity lost SM-dyad

(99) Breaking sadomasochism

(244) SM-dyad broken down by masochism hate and fear⚠️

(299) Chimps and bonobos have no SM-dyad

(371) Muslims lack control over SM-dyad

(392) Political Correctness craves for SM-dyad

(394) Human Religion integrates SM-dyad with Breeding

(396) The SM-dyad / Vanilla-dyad ratio

(394) Human Religion integrates SM-dyad with Breeding

(335) Reincarnation psychosis

(5) Honor killings caused by inbreeding and incest

(7) Honor killings in Islamic culture

(8) Honor killing Scenarios

(99) Breaking sadomasochism

(7) Honor killings in Islamic culture

(8) Honor killing Scenarios

(334) Honor killings are Reincarnation killings

(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales

(16) Masochism Hate, the power of Islam

(92) Sadomasochism in the focal caught

(99) Breaking sadomasochism

(193) Masochism love, hate and fear

(244) SM-dyad broken down by masochism hate and fear⚠️

(265) Sadomasochism, Masochism hate and fear (Tahrir Square)

ROMINA ASHRAFI

(282) How to prevent honor killings 🔴🔴

(312) Honor Killing Standard (Romina Ashrafi)

(339) Islam is guilty of Honor Killings

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Iran,-father-murders-daughter-after-elopement.-
Activists-and-civil-society-in-revolt-50199.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/28/romina-ashrafi-outcry-in-iran-over-so-called-honour-killing-of-14-year-old-girl

'Teenage girl Romina Ashrafi from the northwestern city of Talesh had fallen in love with a man in his thirties and ran away after her father objected to a marriage. After returning home last week, her father beheaded her in her sleep, reportedly with a sickle. The father then reported himself to the police. Agents are said to have found the father with the bleeding murder weapon in his hand.'

(401) Honor killings: cultural transfer or sexual instinct?

(415) Conscious (hate), unconscious ('love'), Honor Killings

(416) No one warned Romina Ashrafi about Reincarnation Psychosis

(282) How to prevent honor killings

(312) Honor Killing Standard (Romina Ashrafi)

(339) Islam is guilty of Honor Killings

(401) Honor killings: cultural transfer or sexual instinct?

(415) Conscious (hate), unconscious ('love'), Honor Killings

Next picture was made in 2010, long before the death of Romina Ashrafi in 2020.

In rural Muslim arias there has been virtually no contact between males for 1400 years. No information exchange about honor killings, no communication whatsoever. And since 'honor killings' is not glorified by the Koran, this was an additional taboo for communication. But how is it possible that Muslim males have been killing their daughters all over the place in exactly the same way all this time? There was no cultural transmission. There remains only one possibility. Reincarnation as breeding-conditioned Sexual Instinct (SI) became frustrated by Islam's prohibition of reincarnation, with an identical result everywhere: honor killings, where the unconscious drive to reincarnation in descendants was stifled by Islam and frustrated by Muslim women.

(39) Killing Honor by fading Perpetual Orgasm
(40) Perpetual Orgasm, the Fourth God

(41) Pedophilia, crowbar in human religion

(44) The Evolution of Pedophilia

(104) Genetic immortality and perpetual orgasm

(204) Pedophilia and perpetual orgasm are derivatives of inbreeding

(269) From pedophilia to perpetual orgasm

(308) From pedophilia to perpetual orgasm

Honor killing can technically be traced to a sick and twisted love affair based on the father's religious displeasure. Its roots lie in pedophilia and stem from the first bipedal primates. Pedophilia is a human religion that should be seen as perpetual orgasm across generations in this lifetime:

Boring cousins

Assumption 156: Incest was the first form of perpetual orgasm: timeless orgasm across generations. Earthly reincarnation as a second form offered endless orgasm in the afterlife of the tribe. But the prospect of the same unattractive cousins and sisters appeared no promise but a curse:

Therefore Homo sapiens invented the parallel universe. It was the flight to an unknown paradise where one could have perpetual orgasm with 72 beautiful fresh woman slaves from other tribes on an entirely new dimension (Outbreeding). It comes down to never ending orgasm, the center of gravity of human male religion.

In our working model we distinguish five areas of sexuality:
heterosexuality, homosexuality, female sexual roles, pedophilia and bestiality. This five-dimensional space also is the power space of males, on which all human power is projected:

Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles
4: Fourth God: pedophilia
5: Fifth God: bestiality

(32) The Archetype of God

(102) Religion through the sound barrier of the animal kingdom

(232) The Archetype of God

(345) Gods are sexual roles

(367) Gods are sexual roles